- 1. Re: XFS + NFS + UMASK (score: 1)
- Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 08:55:25 +0200
- CC'ing the list At 11:29 27-9-2001 -0700, Edward Cates wrote: I'm running Linxux 2.4.8-xfs with NFS v3 on: dual 1 GHz PIII 2 GB RAM Mylex DAC960 RAID card 5 Seagate Cheetah 73.4 GB hard drives blah b
- /archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00627.html (8,194 bytes)
- 2. Re: XFS + NFS + UMASK (score: 1)
- Author: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 07:29:47 +0000
- Yes this would be a known unresolved issue, I'm afraid. We will look at resolving this while merging kernel changes with Andreas G.'s ACL/EA patch. This problem is that we can't apply the umask if we
- /archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00629.html (10,823 bytes)
- 3. Re: XFS + NFS + UMASK (score: 1)
- Author: >
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 08:55:25 +0200
- CC'ing the list At 11:29 27-9-2001 -0700, Edward Cates wrote: I'm running Linxux 2.4.8-xfs with NFS v3 on: dual 1 GHz PIII 2 GB RAM Mylex DAC960 RAID card 5 Seagate Cheetah 73.4 GB hard drives blah b
- /archives/xfs/2001-09/msg01305.html (8,194 bytes)
- 4. Re: XFS + NFS + UMASK (score: 1)
- Author: >
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 07:29:47 +0000
- Yes this would be a known unresolved issue, I'm afraid. We will look at resolving this while merging kernel changes with Andreas G.'s ACL/EA patch. This problem is that we can't apply the umask if we
- /archives/xfs/2001-09/msg01307.html (10,823 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu