Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+\+\s+NFS\s+\+\s+UMASK\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: XFS + NFS + UMASK (score: 1)
Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 08:55:25 +0200
CC'ing the list At 11:29 27-9-2001 -0700, Edward Cates wrote: I'm running Linxux 2.4.8-xfs with NFS v3 on: dual 1 GHz PIII 2 GB RAM Mylex DAC960 RAID card 5 Seagate Cheetah 73.4 GB hard drives blah b
/archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00627.html (8,194 bytes)

2. Re: XFS + NFS + UMASK (score: 1)
Author: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 07:29:47 +0000
Yes this would be a known unresolved issue, I'm afraid. We will look at resolving this while merging kernel changes with Andreas G.'s ACL/EA patch. This problem is that we can't apply the umask if we
/archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00629.html (10,823 bytes)

3. Re: XFS + NFS + UMASK (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 08:55:25 +0200
CC'ing the list At 11:29 27-9-2001 -0700, Edward Cates wrote: I'm running Linxux 2.4.8-xfs with NFS v3 on: dual 1 GHz PIII 2 GB RAM Mylex DAC960 RAID card 5 Seagate Cheetah 73.4 GB hard drives blah b
/archives/xfs/2001-09/msg01305.html (8,194 bytes)

4. Re: XFS + NFS + UMASK (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 07:29:47 +0000
Yes this would be a known unresolved issue, I'm afraid. We will look at resolving this while merging kernel changes with Andreas G.'s ACL/EA patch. This problem is that we can't apply the umask if we
/archives/xfs/2001-09/msg01307.html (10,823 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu