- 1. XFS 1.3.1 (score: 1)
- Author: xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 14:40:39 -0500 (CDT)
- Consistent with our recent letter to the open source community (http://oss.sgi.com/letter_100103.txt), SGI has removed and replaced a trivial number of code segments in XFS that may arguably be relat
- /archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00110.html (7,271 bytes)
- 2. XFS 1.3.1 (score: 1)
- Author:
- Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 14:40:39 -0500 (CDT)
- Consistent with our recent letter to the open source community (http://oss.sgi.com/letter_100103.txt), SGI has removed and replaced a trivial number of code segments in XFS that may arguably be relat
- /archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00394.html (7,271 bytes)
- 3. XFS 1.3.1 (score: 1)
- Author: xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 14:40:39 -0500 (CDT)
- Consistent with our recent letter to the open source community (http://oss.sgi.com/letter_100103.txt), SGI has removed and replaced a trivial number of code segments in XFS that may arguably be relat
- /archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00678.html (7,301 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu