Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+and\s+RAID5\s+Aren\'t\s+Playing\s+Well\s+Together\s+$more\s+info$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+and\s+RAID5\s+Aren\'t\s+Playing\s+Well\s+Together\s+$more\s+info$\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. XFS and RAID5 Aren't Playing Well Together (more info) (score: 1): Author: Danny <danscox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 15:43:20 -0500; As you may remember, Scott Smyth posted a plea for help here last week (or early this week), regarding XFS on RAID5. If an attempt to mount XFS on a RAID5 array while it's rebuilding is made, then t; /archives/xfs/2001-01/msg00181.html (8,917 bytes)
2. Re: XFS and RAID5 Aren't Playing Well Together (more info) (score: 1): Author: "Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 18 Jan 2001 16:32:17 -0500; Because some of our writes operate on smaller entities than the fs block size. Yep. My bug. It seems I never committed the BLKSETSIZE ioctl changes to md. Will run some tests before updating the tre; /archives/xfs/2001-01/msg00185.html (8,237 bytes)
3. XFS and RAID5 Aren't Playing Well Together (more info) (score: 1): Author: Danny <danscox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 15:43:20 -0500; As you may remember, Scott Smyth posted a plea for help here last week (or early this week), regarding XFS on RAID5. If an attempt to mount XFS on a RAID5 array while it's rebuilding is made, then t; /archives/xfs/2001-01/msg00560.html (8,917 bytes)
4. Re: XFS and RAID5 Aren't Playing Well Together (more info) (score: 1): Author: "Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 18 Jan 2001 16:32:17 -0500; Because some of our writes operate on smaller entities than the fs block size. Yep. My bug. It seems I never committed the BLKSETSIZE ioctl changes to md. Will run some tests before updating the tre; /archives/xfs/2001-01/msg00564.html (8,237 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]