Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+and\s+knfsd\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+and\s+knfsd\s*$/: 34 ]

Total 34 documents matching your query.

1. Re: XFS and knfsd (score: 1): Author: Kirk Thoning <kthoning@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:12:00 -0600; Has this issue been resolved? I am getting the same problem on a Redhat 7.1 system using the SGI kernel-2.4.2-SGI_XFS_1.0.i686.rpm. Almost all clients are Redhat 6.2 (~15 clients) with a couple 7.0 a; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00377.html (12,609 bytes)
2. Re: XFS and knfsd (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 20:37:15 +0200 (CEST); Try using 2.4.5 with the XFS patch on top that is available on the FTP site oss.sgi.com. 2.4.5 is better then 2.4.2 from the 1.0 release. It will take some time before a 1.0.1 release comes out. Mayb; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00383.html (7,865 bytes)
3. Re: XFS and knfsd (score: 1): Author: "D. Stimits" <stimits@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:42:29 -0600; At one point I had the NULL pointer dereference at the same address during boot of a new kernel, which did not have SGI patches. It appeared to be aic7xxx failure, but was not. I keep mentioning this; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00392.html (16,975 bytes)
4. Re: XFS and knfsd (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 23:31:01 +0200 (CEST); I have only just setup NFS here at work but I will see if I can provoke some odd behaviour by putting the presure on the NFS server. The server is currently 2.4.6-pre1 based on my testing machine. I; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00395.html (8,584 bytes)
5. Re: XFS and knfsd (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 14:52:38 -0500; This code is in the 2.4.6-pre2 code in the cvs tree now, but you are correct it is not in the patches. Steve; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00411.html (7,809 bytes)
6. Re: XFS and knfsd (score: 1): Author: Kirk Thoning <kthoning@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:12:00 -0600; Has this issue been resolved? I am getting the same problem on a Redhat 7.1 system using the SGI kernel-2.4.2-SGI_XFS_1.0.i686.rpm. Almost all clients are Redhat 6.2 (~15 clients) with a couple 7.0 a; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01547.html (12,609 bytes)
7. Re: XFS and knfsd (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 20:37:15 +0200 (CEST); Try using 2.4.5 with the XFS patch on top that is available on the FTP site oss.sgi.com. 2.4.5 is better then 2.4.2 from the 1.0 release. It will take some time before a 1.0.1 release comes out. Mayb; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01553.html (7,865 bytes)
8. Re: XFS and knfsd (score: 1): Author: "D. Stimits" <stimits@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:42:29 -0600; At one point I had the NULL pointer dereference at the same address during boot of a new kernel, which did not have SGI patches. It appeared to be aic7xxx failure, but was not. I keep mentioning this; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01562.html (16,975 bytes)
9. Re: XFS and knfsd (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 23:31:01 +0200 (CEST); I have only just setup NFS here at work but I will see if I can provoke some odd behaviour by putting the presure on the NFS server. The server is currently 2.4.6-pre1 based on my testing machine. I; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01565.html (8,584 bytes)
10. Re: XFS and knfsd (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 14:52:38 -0500; This code is in the 2.4.6-pre2 code in the cvs tree now, but you are correct it is not in the patches. Steve; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01581.html (7,809 bytes)
11. XFS and knfsd (score: 1): Author: Justin Tripp <justin@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 13:42:10 -0600 (MDT); I think I have found a bug somewhere between XFS and knfsd. If anyone has seen this or if I am missing something, I would appreciate the help. On a dual PIII machine, I have XFS installed on a 130G I; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg00260.html (9,192 bytes)
12. Re: XFS and knfsd (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2001 15:29:58 -0500; Yes, this is not totally surprising, XFS has an inode revalidate operation, the regular interfaces such as the stat call will call this, NFS appears not to use this at all, and assumes that the linux; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg00261.html (10,833 bytes)
13. Re: XFS and knfsd (score: 1): Author: Justin Tripp <justin@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 07:57:10 -0600 (MDT); That's seems to have done the trick. Thanks for the quick response. 'make' is much happier now. Will this make it into the main cvs release, or should I keep a hold of the patch for future releases?; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg00274.html (11,438 bytes)
14. XFS and knfsd (score: 1): Author: Ajay Shekhawat <ajay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 11:04:13 -0400; Are there any tricks to getting knfsd working with XFS? Our server which serves an XFS partition gets an "oops" after about 15 hours of extremely heavy use. I'm using the latest distro from CVS (2.4.; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg00276.html (9,373 bytes)
15. Re: XFS and knfsd (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 10:33:49 -0500; We are aware of your problem, can you fill in a few more details such as are you running nfs v2 or v3 exports and what do you characterize as very heavy load, nfsstat output might be interesting afte; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg00277.html (10,605 bytes)
16. Re: XFS and knfsd (score: 1): Author: Ajay Shekhawat <ajay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 11:56:50 -0400; I'm running NFS v3 exports to 4 Linux clients. Each client hammers on the server by reading random 3MB files (2 processes on each client machine). One of the clients also writes random-sized (upto 2M; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg00278.html (9,663 bytes)
17. Re: XFS and knfsd (score: 1): Author: Ajay Shekhawat <ajay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 10:24:04 -0400; Here's the latest oops: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 373a2e68 printing eip: c013d363 *pde = 00000000 Entering kdb (current=0xc82ca000, pid 4728) on processor 0 Oops: Oops; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg00284.html (10,044 bytes)
18. Re: XFS and knfsd (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 09:29:04 -0500; Hmm, I guess the message I just sent you can be ignored, since you are not using readdir at all (well 1 does not really count). Steve; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg00285.html (10,346 bytes)
19. XFS and knfsd (score: 1): Author: x); Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 13:42:10 -0600 (MDT); I think I have found a bug somewhere between XFS and knfsd. If anyone has seen this or if I am missing something, I would appreciate the help. On a dual PIII machine, I have XFS installed on a 130G I; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg00942.html (9,192 bytes)
20. Re: XFS and knfsd (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2001 15:29:58 -0500; Yes, this is not totally surprising, XFS has an inode revalidate operation, the regular interfaces such as the stat call will call this, NFS appears not to use this at all, and assumes that the linux; /archives/xfs/2001-04/msg00943.html (10,833 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]