Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+in\s+2\.5\.64\-bk3\,\s+compile\s+problem\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+in\s+2\.5\.64\-bk3\,\s+compile\s+problem\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. XFS in 2.5.64-bk3, compile problem (score: 1): Author: William Stearns <wstearns@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 21:33:01 -0500 (EST); Good day, all, My _sincere_ apologies if this a known issue; I haven't followed xfs development. In compiling a 2.5.64-bk3 uml kernel, I found this error when xfs was compiled in: xfs: gcc -Wp,-MD,fs; /archives/xfs/2003-03/msg00142.html (10,545 bytes)
2. Re: XFS in 2.5.64-bk3, compile problem (score: 1): Author: Wessel Dankers <wsl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 15:18:32 +0100; [snip] [snip] The problem is in gcc, not in the kernel. Red Hat ships with a broken, unofficial beta gcc. Please replace that gcc with gcc 3.2.2 (and while you're at it, replace Red Hat with a compet; /archives/xfs/2003-03/msg00145.html (8,513 bytes)
3. Re: XFS in 2.5.64-bk3, compile problem (score: 1): Author: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2003 16:55:10 +0100; The problem is in gcc, not in the kernel. Red Hat ships with a broken, unofficial beta gcc. Please replace that gcc with gcc 3.2.2 (and while you're at it, replace Red Hat with a competent distribut; /archives/xfs/2003-03/msg00146.html (8,203 bytes)
4. Re: XFS in 2.5.64-bk3, compile problem (score: 1): Author: Wessel Dankers <wsl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 17:23:55 +0100; Funny, I don't see a useful reply to his question from you on the list. Perhaps it got lost somewhere? Pardon me for being harsh towards Red Hat for shipping a broken compiler, but if you have such a; /archives/xfs/2003-03/msg00147.html (8,668 bytes)
5. Re: XFS in 2.5.64-bk3, compile problem (score: 1): Author: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 13:54:27 +0100; Wessel Dankers wrote: On 2003-03-09 16:55:10+0100, Stefan Smietanowski wrote: I'm sorry, I missed the sign around your neck saying "Troll". You could put that in your sig for instance so that it's re; /archives/xfs/2003-03/msg00153.html (9,465 bytes)
6. RE: XFS in 2.5.64-bk3, compile problem (score: 1): Author: "l.a walsh" <xfs@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 14:07:06 -0800; ...*scribble* *scribble* *scribble*...note to self. "Troll" = someone who provides helpful answers to repeated questions. *scribble* *scribble* more *scribbling* Stephan smomethingski (I know, it's p; /archives/xfs/2003-03/msg00168.html (8,287 bytes)
7. XFS in 2.5.64-bk3, compile problem (score: 1): Author: William Stearns <wstearns@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 21:33:01 -0500 (EST); Good day, all, My _sincere_ apologies if this a known issue; I haven't followed xfs development. In compiling a 2.5.64-bk3 uml kernel, I found this error when xfs was compiled in: xfs: gcc -Wp,-MD,fs; /archives/xfs/2003-03/msg00611.html (10,545 bytes)
8. Re: XFS in 2.5.64-bk3, compile problem (score: 1): Author: Wessel Dankers <wsl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 15:18:32 +0100; [snip] [snip] The problem is in gcc, not in the kernel. Red Hat ships with a broken, unofficial beta gcc. Please replace that gcc with gcc 3.2.2 (and while you're at it, replace Red Hat with a compet; /archives/xfs/2003-03/msg00614.html (8,513 bytes)
9. Re: XFS in 2.5.64-bk3, compile problem (score: 1): Author: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2003 16:55:10 +0100; The problem is in gcc, not in the kernel. Red Hat ships with a broken, unofficial beta gcc. Please replace that gcc with gcc 3.2.2 (and while you're at it, replace Red Hat with a competent distribut; /archives/xfs/2003-03/msg00615.html (8,203 bytes)
10. Re: XFS in 2.5.64-bk3, compile problem (score: 1): Author: Wessel Dankers <wsl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 17:23:55 +0100; Funny, I don't see a useful reply to his question from you on the list. Perhaps it got lost somewhere? Pardon me for being harsh towards Red Hat for shipping a broken compiler, but if you have such a; /archives/xfs/2003-03/msg00616.html (8,668 bytes)
11. Re: XFS in 2.5.64-bk3, compile problem (score: 1): Author: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 13:54:27 +0100; Wessel Dankers wrote: On 2003-03-09 16:55:10+0100, Stefan Smietanowski wrote: I'm sorry, I missed the sign around your neck saying "Troll". You could put that in your sig for instance so that it's re; /archives/xfs/2003-03/msg00622.html (9,465 bytes)
12. RE: XFS in 2.5.64-bk3, compile problem (score: 1): Author: "l.a walsh" <xfs@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 14:07:06 -0800; ...*scribble* *scribble* *scribble*...note to self. "Troll" = someone who provides helpful answers to repeated questions. *scribble* *scribble* more *scribbling* Stephan smomethingski (I know, it's p; /archives/xfs/2003-03/msg00637.html (8,287 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]