- 1. xfs installer (score: 1)
- Author: "Michael Whang" <mwhang77@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 17:01:04 -0800
- Is there anyone that has created an XFS installer with a later kernel? _________________________________________________________________ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http
- /archives/xfs/2003-03/msg00355.html (6,625 bytes)
- 2. Re: xfs installer (score: 1)
- Author: Jeremy Jackson <jerj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 26 Mar 2003 09:01:24 -0500
- I'm working on one for Debian... Jeremy
- /archives/xfs/2003-03/msg00367.html (7,500 bytes)
- 3. xfs installer (score: 1)
- Author: "Michael Whang" <mwhang77@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 17:01:04 -0800
- Is there anyone that has created an XFS installer with a later kernel? _________________________________________________________________ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http
- /archives/xfs/2003-03/msg00824.html (6,625 bytes)
- 4. Re: xfs installer (score: 1)
- Author: Jeremy Jackson <jerj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 26 Mar 2003 09:01:24 -0500
- I'm working on one for Debian... Jeremy
- /archives/xfs/2003-03/msg00836.html (7,500 bytes)
- 5. (score: 1)
- Author: xxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 07:38:15 +0200 (CEST)
- roblems with Redhat 7.1 in the redhat readme (and the SGI Redhat readme) do too glibc and
- /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00284.html (9,076 bytes)
- 6. kup (score: 1)
- Author: xxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 16:08:19 +1000
- ss table is 0xf05a8000-0xf05a9fff. The stack has got down to 0xf05a9704, struct task is a
- /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00285.html (10,644 bytes)
- 7. xfs (score: 1)
- Author: xxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 13:19:54 +0200
- libxfs code (kernel code), still need to figure out why. The failure happens trying to all
- /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00289.html (8,788 bytes)
- 8. ace (score: 1)
- Author: xxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 13:17:42 +0200
- when I compile quotacheck_v2.c, new compiling error ' undefined reference to '__fswab64' occured .. I think there must be the probelems when compiling them
- /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00290.html (8,980 bytes)
- 9. ace (score: 1)
- Author: xxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 21:42:11 +1000
- k_v1.c, where <asm/byteorder.h> is, try this... include <asm/byteorder.h> [This is derived
- /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00293.html (9,523 bytes)
- 10. FS] kernel nfsd crash (score: 1)
- Author: xxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 08:46:26 -0500
- have to check at home on the ppc what exactly it was ... somehow a define is set so the th
- /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00298.html (9,183 bytes)
- 11. ash (score: 1)
- Author: xxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 16:18:07 +0200
- impler: if (!pdentry && tdentry->d_inode == NULL) { dput(tdentry); return ERRPTR(-EINVAL);
- /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00299.html (9,388 bytes)
- 12. 7.1 XFS 1.0 installer (score: 1)
- Author: xxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 09:33:04 -0500
- s backwards in a directory is the issue, if you have control over your glibc it can be fi
- /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00301.html (10,042 bytes)
- 13. ler (score: 1)
- Author: xxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 14:38:13 +0200
- properly. I agree that it's not an XFS issue..but I wasn't sure and wanted to come here f
- /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00302.html (9,290 bytes)
- 14. nstaller (score: 1)
- Author: xxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 16:48:07 +0200
- f filesystems of large blocksize than pagesize is also going to be of some interest. Ralf
- /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00304.html (9,050 bytes)
- 15. ode on journaling fs. (score: 1)
- Author: xxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 09:56:22 -0500
- .4 / glibc 2.2 and for 32-bit systems building applications with the large file API. Ralf
- /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00306.html (11,135 bytes)
- 16. 7.1 XFS 1.0 installer (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 07:38:15 +0200 (CEST)
- segfault several hundred times a second and the cpu utilization
- /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg01174.html (9,076 bytes)
- 17. ller (score: 1)
- Author: @xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 16:08:19 +1000
- Seems there is some subtle differences between the ia32 header
- /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg01175.html (10,644 bytes)
- 18. e: Problems with mkfs.xfs (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 13:19:54 +0200
- t the blocksize must equal pagesize to be able to als mount it under linux. This has d
- /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg01179.html (8,788 bytes)
- 19. kfs.xfs (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 13:17:42 +0200
- nd, AFAICT, there was no IRIX 6.2 patch. The default XFS blocksize on an Indy is 4K, you shouldn't have any trouble there. You could upgrade your Indy
- /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg01180.html (8,980 bytes)
- 20. staller (score: 1)
- Author: ck@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 21:42:11 +1000
- k_v2.c, new compiling error ' undefined reference to '__fswab64' occured .. I think there must be the probelems when compiling them
- /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg01183.html (9,523 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu