Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+mkfs\/mount\s+options\s+\(w\/\s+better\s+results\s+this\s+time\)\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. XFS mkfs/mount options (w/ better results this time) (score: 1)
Author: Mark <musicman529@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
I have found that Dbench highlights the differences of various filesystems' throughput, and the results are surprising. (Summary: XFS is the clear winner, under pretty much all circumstances.) The ba
/archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00273.html (11,468 bytes)

2. Re: XFS mkfs/mount options (w/ better results this time) (score: 1)
Author: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:50:20 +0200
Am Montag 23 Juni 2008 schrieb Mark: [...] Thats interesting. I was curious and thus switched from cfq to deadline scheduler during parallel I/O workload on my ThinkPad T42 (aptitude upgrade / kmail
/archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00276.html (9,529 bytes)

3. Re: XFS mkfs/mount options (w/ better results this time) (score: 1)
Author: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:10:20 +0200
Am Montag 23 Juni 2008 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: It feels like I have a completely different system. Not only on massive parallel I/O. Starting OpenOffice... starting KDE apps... deadline seems to
/archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00277.html (9,842 bytes)

4. XFS mkfs/mount options (w/ better results this time) (score: 1)
Author: Mark <musicman529@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
I have found that Dbench highlights the differences of various filesystems' throughput, and the results are surprising. (Summary: XFS is the clear winner, under pretty much all circumstances.) The ba
/archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00733.html (11,468 bytes)

5. Re: XFS mkfs/mount options (w/ better results this time) (score: 1)
Author: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:50:20 +0200
Am Montag 23 Juni 2008 schrieb Mark: [...] Thats interesting. I was curious and thus switched from cfq to deadline scheduler during parallel I/O workload on my ThinkPad T42 (aptitude upgrade / kmail
/archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00736.html (9,529 bytes)

6. Re: XFS mkfs/mount options (w/ better results this time) (score: 1)
Author: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:10:20 +0200
Am Montag 23 Juni 2008 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: It feels like I have a completely different system. Not only on massive parallel I/O. Starting OpenOffice... starting KDE apps... deadline seems to
/archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00737.html (9,842 bytes)

7. XFS mkfs/mount options (w/ better results this time) (score: 1)
Author: Mark <musicman529@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
I have found that Dbench highlights the differences of various filesystems' throughput, and the results are surprising. (Summary: XFS is the clear winner, under pretty much all circumstances.) The ba
/archives/xfs/2008-06/msg01193.html (11,468 bytes)

8. Re: XFS mkfs/mount options (w/ better results this time) (score: 1)
Author: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:50:20 +0200
Am Montag 23 Juni 2008 schrieb Mark: [...] Thats interesting. I was curious and thus switched from cfq to deadline scheduler during parallel I/O workload on my ThinkPad T42 (aptitude upgrade / kmail
/archives/xfs/2008-06/msg01196.html (9,590 bytes)

9. Re: XFS mkfs/mount options (w/ better results this time) (score: 1)
Author: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:10:20 +0200
Am Montag 23 Juni 2008 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: It feels like I have a completely different system. Not only on massive parallel I/O. Starting OpenOffice... starting KDE apps... deadline seems to
/archives/xfs/2008-06/msg01197.html (9,946 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu