Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+on\s+x86

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+on\s+x86_64\s+Linux\s+Question\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Re: XFS on x86_64 Linux Question (score: 1): Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 06:36:40 -0400 (EDT); With correct CC'd address. On Sat, 28 Apr 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote: Hello-- Had a quick question, if I re-provision a host with an Intel Core Duo CPU with x86_64 Linux; I create a software raid arra; /archives/xfs/2007-04/msg00182.html (8,327 bytes)
2. XFS on x86_64 Linux Question (score: 1): Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 06:35:47 -0400 (EDT); Had a quick question, if I re-provision a host with an Intel Core Duo CPU with x86_64 Linux; I create a software raid array and use the XFS filesystem-- all in 64bit space... If I boot a recovery im; /archives/xfs/2007-04/msg00183.html (7,602 bytes)
3. Re: XFS on x86_64 Linux Question (score: 1): Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 08:09:53 -0400 (EDT); Wow, probably better to stick with 32bit then? On Sat, 28 Apr 2007, Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro) wrote: Justin hello I have tested 32 to 64 bit porting of linux raid5 and xfs and LVM it worked. though i cann; /archives/xfs/2007-04/msg00184.html (9,685 bytes)
4. Re: XFS on x86_64 Linux Question (score: 1): Author: "Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro)" <raziebe@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:57:19 +0300; - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Raz; /archives/xfs/2007-04/msg00185.html (10,194 bytes)
5. Re: XFS on x86_64 Linux Question (score: 1): Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:41:42 -0400 (EDT); On Sat, 28 Apr 2007, Andi Kleen wrote: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: Had a quick question, if I re-provision a host with an Intel Core Duo CPU with x86_64 Linux; I create a software; /archives/xfs/2007-04/msg00186.html (9,017 bytes)
6. Re: XFS on x86_64 Linux Question (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 28 Apr 2007 19:32:11 +0200; There used to be a XFS bug that 32bit journals couldn't be replayed on 64bit and vice versa. This means you couldn't mount a dirty file system on the other architecture. But this bug has been long fi; /archives/xfs/2007-04/msg00187.html (8,331 bytes)
7. Re: XFS on x86_64 Linux Question (score: 1): Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 06:36:40 -0400 (EDT); With correct CC'd address. On Sat, 28 Apr 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote: Hello-- Had a quick question, if I re-provision a host with an Intel Core Duo CPU with x86_64 Linux; I create a software raid arra; /archives/xfs/2007-04/msg00387.html (8,327 bytes)
8. XFS on x86_64 Linux Question (score: 1): Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 06:35:47 -0400 (EDT); Had a quick question, if I re-provision a host with an Intel Core Duo CPU with x86_64 Linux; I create a software raid array and use the XFS filesystem-- all in 64bit space... If I boot a recovery im; /archives/xfs/2007-04/msg00388.html (7,602 bytes)
9. Re: XFS on x86_64 Linux Question (score: 1): Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 08:09:53 -0400 (EDT); Wow, probably better to stick with 32bit then? On Sat, 28 Apr 2007, Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro) wrote: Justin hello I have tested 32 to 64 bit porting of linux raid5 and xfs and LVM it worked. though i cann; /archives/xfs/2007-04/msg00389.html (9,685 bytes)
10. Re: XFS on x86_64 Linux Question (score: 1): Author: "Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro)" <raziebe@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:57:19 +0300; - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Raz; /archives/xfs/2007-04/msg00390.html (10,194 bytes)
11. Re: XFS on x86_64 Linux Question (score: 1): Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:41:42 -0400 (EDT); On Sat, 28 Apr 2007, Andi Kleen wrote: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: Had a quick question, if I re-provision a host with an Intel Core Duo CPU with x86_64 Linux; I create a software; /archives/xfs/2007-04/msg00391.html (9,017 bytes)
12. Re: XFS on x86_64 Linux Question (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 28 Apr 2007 19:32:11 +0200; There used to be a XFS bug that 32bit journals couldn't be replayed on 64bit and vice versa. This means you couldn't mount a dirty file system on the other architecture. But this bug has been long fi; /archives/xfs/2007-04/msg00392.html (8,331 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]