Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+partition\s+problem\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+partition\s+problem\s*$/: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

1. Re: XFS partition problem (score: 1): Author: Raphael Bauduin <raphael.bauduin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:51:32 +0200; Eric Sandeen wrote: On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, Raphael Bauduin wrote: I've looked at older logs and those messages appeared at a boot of 3 december, also followed by this: Dec 3 10:18:19 dotnet kernel: Sta; /archives/xfs/2004-07/msg00000.html (9,123 bytes)
2. Re: XFS partition problem (score: 1): Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 12:47:30 -0700; xfs_repair should not be required in this case, if for some reason it is required and these files are not being dealt with properly then it's a bug. --cw; /archives/xfs/2004-07/msg00002.html (7,626 bytes)
3. Re: XFS partition problem (score: 1): Author: Raphael Bauduin <raphael.bauduin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:51:32 +0200; Eric Sandeen wrote: On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, Raphael Bauduin wrote: I've looked at older logs and those messages appeared at a boot of 3 december, also followed by this: Dec 3 10:18:19 dotnet kernel: Sta; /archives/xfs/2004-07/msg00218.html (9,123 bytes)
4. Re: XFS partition problem (score: 1): Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 12:47:30 -0700; xfs_repair should not be required in this case, if for some reason it is required and these files are not being dealt with properly then it's a bug. --cw; /archives/xfs/2004-07/msg00220.html (7,626 bytes)
5. XFS partition problem (score: 1): Author: wig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 16:20:39 +0200; I have a problem on a XFS partition on a debian stable system. The system running was 2.4.20 and I compiled a 2.4.26. As performance was taking a hit when running on the 2.4.26, I rebooted it severa; /archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00227.html (14,264 bytes)
6. Re: XFS partition problem (score: 1): Author: cki <kszysiu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 20:11:53 +0200; Raphael Bauduin schrieb: could you use a better cable and see, if the PCI errors go away? also check earlier logs again, *maybe* the PCI errors appeared way before the fs took note. do you have "work; /archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00231.html (8,579 bytes)
7. Re: XFS partition problem (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 10:36:33 +0200; evilninja wrote: --BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-- Hash: SHA1 Raphael Bauduin schrieb: From what I read on the web, this could be due to a suboptimal cable, but could it be the cause of the XFS problems?; /archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00242.html (11,302 bytes)
8. Re: XFS partition problem (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 13:01:23 +0200; Raphael Bauduin schrieb: hm, not being an XFS hacker, i'd say: yes, indeed. unmounting & mounting an XFS here gives: prinz kernel: XFS mounting filesystem sda8 prinz kernel: Ending clean XFS mount fo; /archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00243.html (9,424 bytes)
9. Re: XFS partition problem (score: 1): Author: l Bauduin <raphael.bauduin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 14:14:51 +0200; evilninja wrote: --BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-- Hash: SHA1 Raphael Bauduin schrieb: Dec 3 10:18:19 dotnet kernel: Starting XFS recovery on filesystem: sd(8,38) (dev: 8/38) Dec 3 10:18:19 dotnet kernel:; /archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00244.html (11,720 bytes)
10. Re: XFS partition problem (score: 1): Author: nja <evilninja@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 09:42:16 -0500 (CDT); that does mean that it was not cleanly unmounted, and it is using the journal/log for recovery. This is normal xfs operation. It should not; xfs is designed to replay the log to get a consistent file; /archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00245.html (8,542 bytes)
11. Re: XFS partition problem (score: 1): Author: Bauduin <raphael.bauduin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 09:43:24 -0500 (CDT); xfs stays compatible across kernel versions. -eric; /archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00246.html (7,806 bytes)
12. XFS partition problem (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 16:20:39 +0200; I have a problem on a XFS partition on a debian stable system. The system running was 2.4.20 and I compiled a 2.4.26. As performance was taking a hit when running on the 2.4.26, I rebooted it severa; /archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00513.html (14,264 bytes)
13. Re: XFS partition problem (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 20:11:53 +0200; Raphael Bauduin schrieb: could you use a better cable and see, if the PCI errors go away? also check earlier logs again, *maybe* the PCI errors appeared way before the fs took note. do you have "work; /archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00517.html (8,579 bytes)
14. Re: XFS partition problem (score: 1): Author: Kevin P. Fleming" <kpfleming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 10:36:33 +0200; evilninja wrote: --BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-- Hash: SHA1 Raphael Bauduin schrieb: From what I read on the web, this could be due to a suboptimal cable, but could it be the cause of the XFS problems?; /archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00528.html (11,302 bytes)
15. Re: XFS partition problem (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 13:01:23 +0200; Raphael Bauduin schrieb: hm, not being an XFS hacker, i'd say: yes, indeed. unmounting & mounting an XFS here gives: prinz kernel: XFS mounting filesystem sda8 prinz kernel: Ending clean XFS mount fo; /archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00529.html (9,424 bytes)
16. Re: XFS partition problem (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 14:14:51 +0200; evilninja wrote: --BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-- Hash: SHA1 Raphael Bauduin schrieb: Dec 3 10:18:19 dotnet kernel: Starting XFS recovery on filesystem: sd(8,38) (dev: 8/38) Dec 3 10:18:19 dotnet kernel:; /archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00530.html (11,720 bytes)
17. Re: XFS partition problem (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 09:42:16 -0500 (CDT); that does mean that it was not cleanly unmounted, and it is using the journal/log for recovery. This is normal xfs operation. It should not; xfs is designed to replay the log to get a consistent file; /archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00531.html (8,542 bytes)
18. Re: XFS partition problem (score: 1): Author: in <raphael.bauduin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 09:43:24 -0500 (CDT); xfs stays compatible across kernel versions. -eric; /archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00532.html (7,806 bytes)
19. XFS partition problem (score: 1): Author: Raphael Bauduin <raphael.bauduin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 16:20:39 +0200; Hi, I have a problem on a XFS partition on a debian stable system. The system running was 2.4.20 and I compiled a 2.4.26. As performance was taking a hit when running on the 2.4.26, I rebooted it sev; /archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00799.html (13,616 bytes)
20. Re: XFS partition problem (score: 1): Author: evilninja <evilninja@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 20:11:53 +0200; Raphael Bauduin schrieb: could you use a better cable and see, if the PCI errors go away? also check earlier logs again, *maybe* the PCI errors appeared way before the fs took note. do you have "work; /archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00803.html (8,642 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]