Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS_VERSION_STRING\s+not\s+autoversioning\?\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. XFS_VERSION_STRING not autoversioning? (score: 1)
Author: <zaphodb@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 10:12:31 -0800
ut
/archives/xfs/2004-12/msg00016.html (7,478 bytes)

2. Re: XFS_VERSION_STRING not autoversioning? (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 09:57:26 +1100
us
/archives/xfs/2004-12/msg00017.html (7,430 bytes)

3. XFS_VERSION_STRING not autoversioning? (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 10:12:31 -0800
, but
/archives/xfs/2004-12/msg00116.html (7,478 bytes)

4. Re: XFS_VERSION_STRING not autoversioning? (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 09:57:26 +1100
w.hus
/archives/xfs/2004-12/msg00117.html (7,430 bytes)

5. XFS_VERSION_STRING not autoversioning? (score: 1)
Author: <zaphodb@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 10:12:31 -0800
It seems that XFS_VERSION_STRING in the Linux-2.4/Linux 2.6 CVS code is stuck at 2004-10-22. Is this by design? Cheers. --BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-- Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hus
/archives/xfs/2004-12/msg00216.html (7,538 bytes)

6. Re: XFS_VERSION_STRING not autoversioning? (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 09:57:26 +1100
No, not by design; Russells fixed it now. cheers. -- Nathan
/archives/xfs/2004-12/msg00217.html (7,500 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu