- 1. fs. (score: 1)
- Author: xxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 10:05:53 -0500
- ould be sufficient to be sure that the data has been written. On an "old" file system ther
- /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00307.html (8,682 bytes)
- 2. er allocation failed. (score: 1)
- Author: xxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 09:58:21 -0500
- emember what it looks like now. here is an old patch: -- glibc-2.1.3/sysdeps/unix/sysv/lin
- /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00308.html (8,414 bytes)
- 3. 1 .. JUST INCREDIBLE! (score: 1)
- Author: xxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 18:14:16 +0200 (CEST)
- S. There's no 1.0.1 for 2.4.7 since as the kernel changes, XFS has to change, and it's no lo
- /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00310.html (9,606 bytes)
- 4. ode on journaling fs. (score: 1)
- Author: xxxx>
- Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 02:00:04 -0400
- is should also give you efficient extent allocation on XFS. For ext2 you should also fdat
- /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00352.html (8,719 bytes)
- 5. te mode on journaling fs. (score: 1)
- Author: rd@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 10:05:53 -0500
- ge sizes of 1kb an higher, so the case of filesystems of large blocksize than pagesize is also going to be of some interest. Ralf
- /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg01197.html (8,682 bytes)
- 6. r (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 09:58:21 -0500
- cessor Dell server. I'm serving a 200 GB hardware RAID XFS filesystem to a couple of Origin 200 servers. (I had to apply a small p
- /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg01198.html (8,414 bytes)
- 7. ion failed. (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 18:14:16 +0200 (CEST)
- sure that the data has been written. On an "old" file system ther
- /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg01200.html (9,606 bytes)
- 8. . (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 02:00:04 -0400
- true original modes. There is no problem for a C program to se
- /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg01242.html (8,719 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu