- 1. (was: xfs_repair trouble) (score: 1)
- Author: "hhh"<love_v@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 20:58:09 +0800 (CST)
- e.sauter-bc.com (unknown [10.1.6.21]) by basel1.sauter-bc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB16157306; Tue, 14 May 2002 08:01:11 +0200 (CEST) Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx Organization: Sauter AG,
- /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00219.html (7,973 bytes)
- 2. : (score: 1)
- Author: Skylar Thompson <skylar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 21:57:17 -0500
- .. :) Seriously, no combination of xfsrestore commands is special with regard to restoring or not restoring files. I have tried incremental, sub-path specification, and full restores. Inc
- /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00241.html (8,375 bytes)
- 3. problems (score: 1)
- Author: Harri Haataja <harri.haataja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 13:33:49 +0300
- dev=n,o,p speed=s image.iso where n, o, and p are the numbers for the host adapter, the bus (channel), and ID number of the device, and s is the speed (in 150kB/s units) of the writer. --
- /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00242.html (8,139 bytes)
- 4. H7.3 installer - question (score: 1)
- Author: Skylar Thompson <skylar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 06:37:38 -0500
- ble to create ISO image with SGI installer as a replacement of the origuinal RH 7.3 disk 1 ? It's very inconvenient to switch 3 disks. With just two (SGI modified "boot" and original RH7.
- /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00245.html (9,515 bytes)
- 5. (score: 1)
- Author: "hhh"<love_v@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 20:58:09 +0800 (CST)
- nd out the reason, the problem only occured on the machine with scsi hdd. i have setup 3 scsi machines: machine A - adaptec 29160, ibm 18g scsi machine B - adaptec 29160, seagat
- /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00857.html (7,973 bytes)
- 6. ountpoint looks like this?: (score: 1)
- Author: Skylar Thompson <skylar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 21:57:17 -0500
- stin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx "One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and try to r
- /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00879.html (8,375 bytes)
- 7. ike this?: (score: 1)
- Author: Harri Haataja <harri.haataja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 13:33:49 +0300
- sly, no combination of xfsrestore commands is special with regard to restoring or not restoring files. I have tried incremental, sub-path specification, and full restores. Inc
- /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00880.html (8,139 bytes)
- 8. on the 2.4.18 XFS tree? (score: 1)
- Author: Skylar Thompson <skylar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 06:37:38 -0500
- o see this behavior on my system running the kernel from the 2.4 XFS CVS tree. It is somewhat reproduceable. The problem is that I started up a number of "rxvt" sessions and th
- /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00883.html (9,515 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu