Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*are\s+xfs\s+working\s+on\s+amd64\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*are\s+xfs\s+working\s+on\s+amd64\s+\?\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. are xfs working on amd64 ? (score: 1): Author:; Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 05:13:24 +0300; I have dual opteron gentoo box with xfsed / I tried use this kernel ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/testing/RHEL/SRPMS/kernel-2.4.21-9.EL.sgi1.sr c.rpm but after "insmod /modules/xfs.o" (I use initrd); /archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00325.html (7,381 bytes)
2. Re: are xfs working on amd64 ? (score: 1): Author:; Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 23:03:47 -0600 (CST); I have not tried that particular src.rpm on an amd64 (I don't have the hardware...) but as far as I know, xfs works fine on the platform - I'd suggest trying a stock 2.4.25 kernel first, and see how; /archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00326.html (8,332 bytes)
3. Re: are xfs working on amd64 ? (score: 1): Author:; Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 16:21:45 +1100; No kdb support for AMD x86_64. The x86_64 maintainers have not sent any patches, nor do I have any hardware to test on.; /archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00327.html (7,595 bytes)
4. Re: are xfs working on amd64 ? (score: 1): Author:; Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 08:50:10 +0300 (MSK); <"Eric Sandeen"> Due to nptled glibc I can't use pure 2.4.x kernels only redhat kernels or 2.6.x. I tried use kernels from atrpms but all fedora and rh9 kernel failed to compile, for example : 08:38; /archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00328.html (13,065 bytes)
5. Re: are xfs working on amd64 ? (score: 1): Author:; Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:08:46 +0100; I've been using XFS on x86-64 systems running 2.4 and 2.6 kernels without any problems. Distribution used was Suse 9.0 for x86-64. The 2.4 kernels (x86-64) were the precompiled ones supplied by Suse.; /archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00329.html (8,398 bytes)
6. Re: are xfs working on amd64 ? (score: 1): Author:; Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 12:27:13 +0100; If you have any newer version of the RHEL+xfs kernel, it would be nice if you could upload it. The current one didn't work for me.. wouldn't boot with root-fs on LVM. This works fine with the 2.4.21-; /archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00330.html (8,239 bytes)
7. Re: are xfs working on amd64 ? (score: 1): Author:; Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 15:13:33 +0300; В Вск, 29.02.2004, в 13:08, Christian пишет: Can you post your kernel and hardware config? Suse does not support nptl. RedHat support it and also their kernels have new sheduler (http://www.redhat.co; /archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00331.html (9,308 bytes)
8. are xfs working on amd64 ? (score: 1): Author: x; Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 05:13:24 +0300; at is > 4; /archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00660.html (7,381 bytes)
9. Re: are xfs working on amd64 ? (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 23:03:47 -0600 (CST); e initrd); /archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00661.html (8,332 bytes)
10. Re: are xfs working on amd64 ? (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 16:21:45 +1100; d see how; /archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00662.html (7,595 bytes)
11. Re: are xfs working on amd64 ? (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 08:50:10 +0300 (MSK); test on.; /archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00663.html (13,065 bytes)
12. Re: are xfs working on amd64 ? (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:08:46 +0100; e : 08:38; /archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00664.html (8,398 bytes)
13. Re: are xfs working on amd64 ? (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 12:27:13 +0100; by Suse.; /archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00665.html (8,239 bytes)
14. Re: are xfs working on amd64 ? (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 15:13:33 +0300; e 2.4.21-; /archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00666.html (9,308 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]