Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*backport\s+to\s+2\.2\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*backport\s+to\s+2\.2\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. backport to 2.2 (score: 1): Author: Robert Sander <ml-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 10:46:35 +0000 (UTC); Are there any thoughts about backporting XFS to the Linux kernel 2.2.19? The current non-stability of the 2.4 series makes it nearly impossible to run that great filesystem on production machines. W; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00493.html (7,646 bytes)
2. Re: backport to 2.2 (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 13:09:09 +0200; Are there any thoughts about backporting XFS to the Linux kernel 2.2.19? No. The current non-stability of the 2.4 series makes it nearly impossible to run that great filesystem on production machines; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00494.html (7,951 bytes)
3. Re: backport to 2.2 (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 13:48:16 +0200; It would be very hard, nearly like a new port of XFS. XFS and its pagebuf layer is heavily tied to the 2.4+ VM system and uses infrastructure that wasn't there in 2.2. -Andi; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00495.html (7,988 bytes)
4. Re: backport to 2.2 (score: 1): Author: Robert Sander <ml-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 11:52:49 +0000 (UTC); I see. And as the VM is causing most of the trouble in 2.4, how stable would you rate XFS? Tonight I will try the Mandrake 2.4.8 kernel (which already has the needed aacraid patch included), but when; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00496.html (8,323 bytes)
5. Re: backport to 2.2 (score: 1): Author: Bryan-TheBS-Smith <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 08:23:22 -0400; If you want journaling on 2.2, go Ext3. I ran the older, full data journaling-only releases for over a year without issues. It's essentially "double buffering." Try this kernels: http://smithconcepts; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00621.html (8,835 bytes)
6. backport to 2.2 (score: 1): Author: Robert Sander <ml-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 10:46:35 +0000 (UTC); i; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01573.html (7,646 bytes)
7. Re: backport to 2.2 (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 13:09:09 +0200; W; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01574.html (7,951 bytes)
8. Re: backport to 2.2 (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 13:48:16 +0200; s; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01575.html (7,988 bytes)
9. Re: backport to 2.2 (score: 1): Author: Robert Sander <ml-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 11:52:49 +0000 (UTC); i; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01576.html (8,323 bytes)
10. Re: backport to 2.2 (score: 1): Author: Bryan-TheBS-Smith <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 08:23:22 -0400; u; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01701.html (8,835 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]