Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ext3\s+\+\s+xfs\s+\+\s+jfs\s+\+\s+reiser\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ext3\s+\+\s+xfs\s+\+\s+jfs\s+\+\s+reiser\s*$/: 48 ]

Total 48 documents matching your query.

1. ext3 + xfs + jfs + reiser (score: 1): Author: pac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 12:21:06 -0500; Anyone know of a super-duper-all-in-one patch for xfs+ext3+jfs+ (reiser is already in the kernel) ? -pac -- .--. `--'; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00743.html (7,988 bytes)
2. Re: ext3 + xfs + jfs + reiser (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: 22 Oct 2001 12:30:29 -0500; Dunno about a single patch, but the latest Mandrake has all of those filesystems co-existing. -Eric -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs sandeen@xxxxxxx SGI, Inc.; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00744.html (8,448 bytes)
3. Re: ext3 + xfs + jfs + reiser (score: 1): Author: Derek Glidden <dglidden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 13:43:07 -0400; On a slight tangent, I was at an expo last week and a SuSE guy was also there. A brief discussion popped up about journaling filesystems and we determined that XFS was *not* going to be in SuSE 7.3 w; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00745.html (10,155 bytes)
4. Re: ext3 + xfs + jfs + reiser (score: 1): Author: Jeff Layton <jeffrey.b.layton@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 14:03:31 -0400; A friend of mine moded the XFS patch for 2.4.10. He then built a 2.4.10 kernel with of the above in it. I can pass along the XFS patch if anyone is interested (plus links to the appropriate patches f; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00746.html (8,780 bytes)
5. Re: ext3 + xfs + jfs + reiser (score: 1): Author: Hristo Grigorov <Hristo.Grigorov@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 21:07:32 +0300; Weird... Both SuSe and RedHat pretend to aim enterprise market and at the same time they don't want to support _real_ enterprise filesystems like XFS and JFS. I would bet that most mission critical s; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00747.html (10,050 bytes)
6. Re: ext3 + xfs + jfs + reiser (score: 1): Author: Justin Coffey <justin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 10:56:14 -0700 (PDT); I'm not sure I agree. We tested smallish sized hardware raids with XFS (albeit about 3 months ago) and had a devil of a time trying to get it work correctly. Generally, we just ran into the OS not b; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00748.html (11,046 bytes)
7. Re: ext3 + xfs + jfs + reiser (score: 1): Author: Justin Coffey <justin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 11:00:53 -0700 (PDT); Er, that was "Now, I'm NOT trying to start a flame." The subconscious speaks, no? -- Justin Coffey coffeyj@xxxxxxxxx Technical Advisor http://www.homes.com --; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00749.html (12,008 bytes)
8. Re: ext3 + xfs + jfs + reiser (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: 22 Oct 2001 13:16:34 -0500; Hi Justin - Did you report any of these problems? I don't see any other messages from you or your domain... I'd be interested to know the details, as several people have been using XFS+RAID successfu; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00750.html (9,699 bytes)
9. Re: ext3 + xfs + jfs + reiser (score: 1): Author: Justin Coffey <justin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 11:16:04 -0700 (PDT); Very true. I'll tell you what, we've actually just freed up similar hardware to what we were using and I'll do a fresh install on it and take another look. The basic setup (though I can't remember dr; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00751.html (10,887 bytes)
10. Re: ext3 + xfs + jfs + reiser (score: 1): Author: Bryan-TheBS-Smith <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 14:54:36 -0400; That's odd. You couldn't even get it to mount the volume??? What hardware? I have used the stock 2.4.3-XFS kernel with a variety of hardware RAID controllers now, using initrds to load the necessary; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00754.html (10,030 bytes)
11. Re: ext3 + xfs + jfs + reiser (score: 1): Author: Justin Coffey <justin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 11:40:06 -0700 (PDT); IBM Netfinity 5500 w/ServeRAID II, RedHat 7.0 w/2.4.5+xfs compiled with an updated compiler and I *think* updated libraries. We were running RAID 0+1. -- Justin Coffey coffeyj@xxxxxxxxx Technical Adv; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00755.html (10,832 bytes)
12. Re: ext3 + xfs + jfs + reiser (score: 1): Author: Jean Francois Martinez <jfm2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 21:01:57 +0200; Eric Sandeen a écrit : I think this is silly and demagogic. There are reasons to include ext3 due to the easy transition but for the other three I am a man of simple tastes: I only want the best on; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00756.html (9,428 bytes)
13. Re: ext3 + xfs + jfs + reiser (score: 1): Author: Bryan-TheBS-Smith <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 15:01:37 -0400; Even if you update the RedHat compiler, do *NOT* use RedHat 7.0's GCC "2.96" at all for kernel compiles. You want to make sure the kernel Makefile (in /usr/src/linux) is changed to "kgcc" on RedHat 7; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00757.html (10,672 bytes)
14. Re: ext3 + xfs + jfs + reiser (score: 1): Author: Justin Coffey <justin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 11:52:16 -0700 (PDT); I definitely made the change to kgcc. I couldn't even get the kernel to compile without that. Ya know, I've just never trusted things like this unless I compile them myself. I dunno, I'm just strang; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00759.html (10,690 bytes)
15. Re: ext3 + xfs + jfs + reiser (score: 1): Author: Nigel Kukard <nkukard@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 21:15:19 +0000 (UTC); you think? hahahah, its a FACT!!!!! X F S I S T H E B E S T ! -Nigel -- == Contact Details -- Name: Nigel Kukard GSM Mobile: (+27) 082 564 2120 GSM Fax: (+27) 082 131 564 2120 Email: nkukard@xxxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00760.html (9,441 bytes)
16. Re: ext3 + xfs + jfs + reiser (score: 1): Author: Bryan-TheBS-Smith <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 15:23:54 -0400; Sounds like a hardware driver issue. The OS shouldn't see any difference with hardware RAID. What kernel were you using for ReiserFS? -- TheBS -- Bryan "TheBS" Smith mailto:b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx chat:th; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00761.html (10,112 bytes)
17. Re: ext3 + xfs + jfs + reiser (score: 1): Author: Justin Coffey <justin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 12:08:16 -0700 (PDT); 2.4.5 I believe, but we've since upgraded it. -- Justin Coffey coffeyj@xxxxxxxxx Technical Advisor http://www.homes.com --; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00762.html (9,702 bytes)
18. Re: ext3 + xfs + jfs + reiser (score: 1): Author: Justin Coffey <justin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 12:09:03 -0700 (PDT); That was my conclusion as well, which is why I moved to Reiser. I just assumed there was some issue with the driver and XFS. -- Justin Coffey coffeyj@xxxxxxxxx Technical Advisor http://www.homes.com; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00763.html (9,547 bytes)
19. Re: ext3 + xfs + jfs + reiser (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 14:26:19 -0500; Two differences between XFS and other filesystems on Linux is that XFS will: However, there should be nothing in what XFS does that any self respecting disk driver/hardware combo should not support; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00764.html (10,363 bytes)
20. Re: ext3 + xfs + jfs + reiser (score: 1): Author: Doruk Fisek <dfisek@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 13:14:02 +0300; everybody's talking about older kernels. aren't new kernels and xfs patches stable? the development team seem pretty quick on releasing new patches as soon as the new kernel is available. Doruk -- FI; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00788.html (8,176 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]