Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*extended\s+attributes\s+support\s+on\s+powerpc\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*extended\s+attributes\s+support\s+on\s+powerpc\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. ng and other strangeness. (score: 1): Author: <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 17:04:35 -0900; extended attributes (and thus acls) do not appear to be supported on powerpc, as far as i can tell this is because the acl-xattr patches do not add the syscall and unistd.h defines for the powerpc a; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00752.html (8,677 bytes)
2. ibutes support on powerpc (score: 1): Author: n@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 13:24:26 +1100; It should be that simple. Find 3 unused syscall numbers in sys_call_table in arch/ppc/kernel/misc.S, in 2.4.17 the next 3 are 208-210. Add these lines after sys_gettid, adjusting to fit current ppc s; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00753.html (9,324 bytes)
3. ibutes support on powerpc (score: 1): Author: kaos@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 17:28:36 -0900; in the i386 version you seem to be adding about 25 dummy syscalls, am i correct in assuming this is just `padding' to avoid conflicts if Linus allocates some new syscalls? is the same necessary/wise; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00754.html (10,926 bytes)
4. ibutes support on powerpc (score: 1): Author: n@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 13:35:46 +1100; For initial testing it is easier to use the next 3 free entries. We added the padding to avoid having to renumber each time Linus used another syscall number. I wish Linus would take the patch for as; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00755.html (8,420 bytes)
5. ibutes support on powerpc (score: 1): Author: kaos@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 18:47:24 -0900; i assume the numbering doesn't affect userland at all, its only used for internal compilation of the kernel correct? $ ls -l /dev/Linus lrwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4 Jan 27 2002 /dev/Linus -> /dev/null $; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00756.html (9,778 bytes)
6. ibutes support on powerpc (score: 1): Author: n@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 15:03:11 +1100; The syscall numbers are also used by the ACL programs. In XFS CVS theye are in cmd/attr/libattr/attr.c at line 292. Forgot about those, I don't work on the user space commands.; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00757.html (8,173 bytes)
7. truncate, mmap and holes. (score: 1): Author: kaos@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 20:36:24 -0900; OK, i patched the kernel and attr, rebuilt the attr package and things appear to be working properly. my patches don't include the extra empty `placeholder' syscalls to avoid conflicts with future sy; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00759.html (11,366 bytes)
8. on xfs added to filemap.c (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 16:02:34 +1100; The ACL userspace will also need updating - see the end of cmd/acl/libacl/acl.c In terms of including these changes, we're looking at ways to consolidate the different ACL/EA userspace packages at th; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00810.html (8,215 bytes)
9. king setting. (score: 1): Author: rnat@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 16:02:34 +1100; The ACL userspace will also need updating - see the end of cmd/acl/libacl/acl.c In terms of including these changes, we're looking at ways to consolidate the different ACL/EA userspace packages at th; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00829.html (8,187 bytes)
10. nting and other strangeness. (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 17:04:35 -0900; extended attributes (and thus acls) do not appear to be supported on powerpc, as far as i can tell this is because the acl-xattr patches do not add the syscall and unistd.h defines for the powerpc a; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01681.html (8,677 bytes)
11. mounting and other strangeness. (score: 1): Author: enson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 13:24:26 +1100; It should be that simple. Find 3 unused syscall numbers in sys_call_table in arch/ppc/kernel/misc.S, in 2.4.17 the next 3 are 208-210. Add these lines after sys_gettid, adjusting to fit current ppc s; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01682.html (9,324 bytes)
12. ttributes support on powerpc (score: 1): Author:; Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 17:28:36 -0900; in the i386 version you seem to be adding about 25 dummy syscalls, am i correct in assuming this is just `padding' to avoid conflicts if Linus allocates some new syscalls? is the same necessary/wise; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01683.html (10,926 bytes)
13. ttributes support on powerpc (score: 1): Author: enson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 13:35:46 +1100; For initial testing it is easier to use the next 3 free entries. We added the padding to avoid having to renumber each time Linus used another syscall number. I wish Linus would take the patch for as; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01684.html (8,420 bytes)
14. ttributes support on powerpc (score: 1): Author:; Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 18:47:24 -0900; i assume the numbering doesn't affect userland at all, its only used for internal compilation of the kernel correct? $ ls -l /dev/Linus lrwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4 Jan 27 2002 /dev/Linus -> /dev/null $; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01685.html (9,778 bytes)
15. ttributes support on powerpc (score: 1): Author: enson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 15:03:11 +1100; The syscall numbers are also used by the ACL programs. In XFS CVS theye are in cmd/attr/libattr/attr.c at line 292. Forgot about those, I don't work on the user space commands.; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01686.html (8,173 bytes)
16. d attributes support on powerpc (score: 1): Author:; Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 20:36:24 -0900; OK, i patched the kernel and attr, rebuilt the attr package and things appear to be working properly. my patches don't include the extra empty `placeholder' syscalls to avoid conflicts with future sy; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01688.html (11,366 bytes)
17. XFS footprint (was Re: TAKE - remove a function xfs added to filemap.c (score: 1): Author: ergs" <rabe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 16:02:34 +1100; The ACL userspace will also need updating - see the end of cmd/acl/libacl/acl.c In terms of including these changes, we're looking at ways to consolidate the different ACL/EA userspace packages at th; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01739.html (8,215 bytes)
18. To Recipient virus found or matched file blocking setting. (score: 1): Author: ent Bernat <bernat@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 16:02:34 +1100; The ACL userspace will also need updating - see the end of cmd/acl/libacl/acl.c In terms of including these changes, we're looking at ways to consolidate the different ACL/EA userspace packages at th; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01758.html (8,187 bytes)
19. extended attributes support on powerpc (score: 1): Author: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 17:04:35 -0900; Hi, extended attributes (and thus acls) do not appear to be supported on powerpc, as far as i can tell this is because the acl-xattr patches do not add the syscall and unistd.h defines for the powerp; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg02610.html (8,692 bytes)
20. Re: extended attributes support on powerpc (score: 1): Author: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 13:24:26 +1100; It should be that simple. Find 3 unused syscall numbers in sys_call_table in arch/ppc/kernel/misc.S, in 2.4.17 the next 3 are 208-210. Add these lines after sys_gettid, adjusting to fit current ppc s; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg02611.html (9,352 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]