Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*fixing\s+SELINUX\-support\s+in\s+XFS\-2\.6\.14\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*fixing\s+SELINUX\-support\s+in\s+XFS\-2\.6\.14\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. Re: fixing SELINUX-support in XFS-2.6.14 (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:20:21 +0000; No, reverting this is bogus. If you really want to support selinux without real transaction support just implement the new inode initialization method without doing adding the labeling to the transac; /archives/xfs/2005-12/msg00000.html (8,553 bytes)
2. Re: fixing SELINUX-support in XFS-2.6.14 (score: 1): Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 06:23:19 +1100; Well, I mainly want to not cause a huge regression for those people who were using it in the stable kernel series. Hmmm ... if its that simple, then that should have been done for reiserfs and XFS be; /archives/xfs/2005-12/msg00001.html (9,802 bytes)
3. Re: fixing SELINUX-support in XFS-2.6.14 (score: 1): Author: Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 09:14:23 -0500; <snip> I don't know whether that would be simple or not (not having looked closely at the xfs implementation), but these patches were discussed on linux-fsdevel and lived in -mm for a while without s; /archives/xfs/2005-12/msg00002.html (9,765 bytes)
4. Re: fixing SELINUX-support in XFS-2.6.14 (score: 1): Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 17:29:56 +1100; Hi Stephen, Apologies for the delay in replying, I've been away for a bit. It wasn't clear to me when I initially read those that the unmodified (but working) filesystems would now be broken. Heh, Ch; /archives/xfs/2005-12/msg00026.html (9,989 bytes)
5. Re: fixing SELINUX-support in XFS-2.6.14 (score: 1): Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 17:36:30 +1100; Does this patch help? (Its a -p1 patch, to be applied from inside fs/xfs in the kernel). thanks. -- Nathan Index: xfs-linux/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c == -- xfs-linux.orig/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c +++ xfs-linu; /archives/xfs/2005-12/msg00027.html (9,827 bytes)
6. Re: fixing SELINUX-support in XFS-2.6.14 (score: 1): Author: Sami Farin <safari-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 15:18:39 +0200; Yes, it seems to work. At least the system boots and security context is created for new files. --; /archives/xfs/2005-12/msg00029.html (8,544 bytes)
7. Re: fixing SELINUX-support in XFS-2.6.14 (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:20:21 +0000; No, reverting this is bogus. If you really want to support selinux without real transaction support just implement the new inode initialization method without doing adding the labeling to the transac; /archives/xfs/2005-12/msg00118.html (8,553 bytes)
8. Re: fixing SELINUX-support in XFS-2.6.14 (score: 1): Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 06:23:19 +1100; Well, I mainly want to not cause a huge regression for those people who were using it in the stable kernel series. Hmmm ... if its that simple, then that should have been done for reiserfs and XFS be; /archives/xfs/2005-12/msg00119.html (9,802 bytes)
9. Re: fixing SELINUX-support in XFS-2.6.14 (score: 1): Author: Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 09:14:23 -0500; <snip> I don't know whether that would be simple or not (not having looked closely at the xfs implementation), but these patches were discussed on linux-fsdevel and lived in -mm for a while without s; /archives/xfs/2005-12/msg00120.html (9,765 bytes)
10. Re: fixing SELINUX-support in XFS-2.6.14 (score: 1): Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 17:29:56 +1100; Hi Stephen, Apologies for the delay in replying, I've been away for a bit. It wasn't clear to me when I initially read those that the unmodified (but working) filesystems would now be broken. Heh, Ch; /archives/xfs/2005-12/msg00144.html (9,989 bytes)
11. Re: fixing SELINUX-support in XFS-2.6.14 (score: 1): Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 17:36:30 +1100; Does this patch help? (Its a -p1 patch, to be applied from inside fs/xfs in the kernel). thanks. -- Nathan Index: xfs-linux/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c == -- xfs-linux.orig/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c +++ xfs-linu; /archives/xfs/2005-12/msg00145.html (9,827 bytes)
12. Re: fixing SELINUX-support in XFS-2.6.14 (score: 1): Author: Sami Farin <safari-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 15:18:39 +0200; Yes, it seems to work. At least the system boots and security context is created for new files. --; /archives/xfs/2005-12/msg00147.html (8,544 bytes)
13. fixing SELINUX-support in XFS-2.6.14 (score: 1): Author: Sami Farin <safari-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 18:34:25 +0200; Does XFS team have plans to make 2.6.14 work with SELINUX? http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=selinux&m=112653995009765&w=2 Would be fun if the fix was included in next 2.6.14.4 or something. (If fix is; /archives/xfs/2005-11/msg00152.html (7,144 bytes)
14. Re: fixing SELINUX-support in XFS-2.6.14 (score: 1): Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 08:27:09 +1100; It is not, we have not fixed this in XFS yet. We have plans to resolve the underlying issue here in XFS (an atomic create with attributes), but this is not trivial and not top of the list of things t; /archives/xfs/2005-11/msg00153.html (8,702 bytes)
15. fixing SELINUX-support in XFS-2.6.14 (score: 1): Author: Sami Farin <safari-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 18:34:25 +0200; Does XFS team have plans to make 2.6.14 work with SELINUX? http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=selinux&m=112653995009765&w=2 Would be fun if the fix was included in next 2.6.14.4 or something. (If fix is; /archives/xfs/2005-11/msg00307.html (7,144 bytes)
16. Re: fixing SELINUX-support in XFS-2.6.14 (score: 1): Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 08:27:09 +1100; It is not, we have not fixed this in XFS yet. We have plans to resolve the underlying issue here in XFS (an atomic create with attributes), but this is not trivial and not top of the list of things t; /archives/xfs/2005-11/msg00308.html (8,702 bytes)
17. Re: fixing SELINUX-support in XFS-2.6.14 (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:20:21 +0000; No, reverting this is bogus. If you really want to support selinux without real transaction support just implement the new inode initialization method without doing adding the labeling to the transac; /archives/xfs/2005-12/msg00236.html (8,728 bytes)
18. Re: fixing SELINUX-support in XFS-2.6.14 (score: 1): Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 06:23:19 +1100; Well, I mainly want to not cause a huge regression for those people who were using it in the stable kernel series. Hmmm ... if its that simple, then that should have been done for reiserfs and XFS be; /archives/xfs/2005-12/msg00237.html (10,015 bytes)
19. Re: fixing SELINUX-support in XFS-2.6.14 (score: 1): Author: Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 09:14:23 -0500; <snip> I don't know whether that would be simple or not (not having looked closely at the xfs implementation), but these patches were discussed on linux-fsdevel and lived in -mm for a while without s; /archives/xfs/2005-12/msg00238.html (9,972 bytes)
20. Re: fixing SELINUX-support in XFS-2.6.14 (score: 1): Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 17:29:56 +1100; Hi Stephen, Apologies for the delay in replying, I've been away for a bit. It wasn't clear to me when I initially read those that the unmodified (but working) filesystems would now be broken. Heh, Ch; /archives/xfs/2005-12/msg00262.html (10,233 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]