- 1. Re: fseeko64() suspended (score: 1)
- Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2000 08:57:05 -0600
- Hmmm, this really looks like something in the program is touching the whole 2 Gbytes of data in there. Can you send us the source code of your program and how you build it (or at least a test case w
- /archives/xfs/2000-11/msg00000.html (9,977 bytes)
- 2. Re: fseeko64() suspended (score: 1)
- Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2000 08:57:05 -0600
- Hmmm, this really looks like something in the program is touching the whole 2 Gbytes of data in there. Can you send us the source code of your program and how you build it (or at least a test case w
- /archives/xfs/2000-11/msg00245.html (9,977 bytes)
- 3. fseeko64() suspended (score: 1)
- Author: "yxy_oversea" <yxy_oversea@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 14:43:13 +0800
- Dear friends: Thanks every much for your kindness, my questions were gradually solved here. Now I can use fseeko64() now, but in fact it takes very long time for a fseeko64() call as if the call is s
- /archives/xfs/2000-10/msg00219.html (12,586 bytes)
- 4. fseeko64() suspended (score: 1)
- Author: "yxy_oversea" <yxy_oversea@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 14:43:13 +0800
- Dear friends: Thanks every much for your kindness, my questions were gradually solved here. Now I can use fseeko64() now, but in fact it takes very long time for a fseeko64() call as if the call is s
- /archives/xfs/2000-10/msg00439.html (12,586 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu