Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*kio\s+on\s+non\-x86\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. kio on non-x86 (score: 1)
Author: Thomas Graichen <news-innominate.list.sgi.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2 Mar 2001 07:57:02 GMT
just updated the kernel on my ppc machine yesterday - worked all fine so far ... that i tried the kio and kiocluster options on the ppc too and ran into problems: as soon as i write to the fs it dete
/archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00021.html (8,642 bytes)

2. Re: kio on non-x86 (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2001 08:30:21 -0600
I presume the same devices worked OK without kio, did they work OK after this shutdown? I think this is true, there are no os specific components, where you using ide or scsi? The ide kio code is sp
/archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00026.html (9,285 bytes)

3. Re: kio on non-x86 (score: 1)
Author: Thomas Graichen <news-innominate.list.sgi.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2 Mar 2001 15:06:09 GMT
just did very short testings (will do more this evening) but i was able to umount/mount them afterwards and xfs_repair was close to happy with them - but more details later without kio XFS on ppc see
/archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00027.html (10,402 bytes)

4. Re: kio on non-x86 (score: 1)
Author: Chaitanya Tumuluri <chait@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 08:38:18 -0500 (EST)
Hi, Do you have the error messages? AFAIK, kiobuf code is _not_ arch specific. There are no arch specific components to the kiobuf code. Though, if you are using more than 1GB there may be an issue w
/archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00028.html (9,359 bytes)

5. Re: kio on non-x86 (score: 1)
Author: Thomas Graichen <news-innominate.list.sgi.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2 Mar 2001 16:55:43 GMT
none so far - but i did not have any of the debugging options turned on (no idea if they would help - maybe not) 128MB - so no problem here (also keep in mind this is on ppc not i386) more later - th
/archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00029.html (10,312 bytes)

6. Re: kio on non-x86 (score: 1)
Author: Chaitanya Tumuluri <chait@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 09:18:37 -0500 (EST)
I was angling for dmesg type outputs that'd indicate drive specific info. if any. Gah! Not enough coffee...too early...I _did_ have i386 in mind. :^) Cheers, -Chait.
/archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00030.html (7,767 bytes)

7. Re: kio on non-x86 (score: 1)
Author: Thomas Graichen <news-innominate.list.sgi.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2 Mar 2001 20:35:38 GMT
ok - i nailed it down further - looks like it's not a problem with XFS but more with the ide driver (ide-pmac.c) ... tried it with an usb floppy drive (which uses usb-storage and thus an scsi layer)
/archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00033.html (8,811 bytes)

8. kio on non-x86 (score: 1)
Author: Thomas Graichen <news-innominate.list.sgi.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2 Mar 2001 07:57:02 GMT
just updated the kernel on my ppc machine yesterday - worked all fine so far ... that i tried the kio and kiocluster options on the ppc too and ran into problems: as soon as i write to the fs it dete
/archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00554.html (8,642 bytes)

9. Re: kio on non-x86 (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2001 08:30:21 -0600
I presume the same devices worked OK without kio, did they work OK after this shutdown? I think this is true, there are no os specific components, where you using ide or scsi? The ide kio code is sp
/archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00559.html (9,285 bytes)

10. Re: kio on non-x86 (score: 1)
Author: Thomas Graichen <news-innominate.list.sgi.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2 Mar 2001 15:06:09 GMT
just did very short testings (will do more this evening) but i was able to umount/mount them afterwards and xfs_repair was close to happy with them - but more details later without kio XFS on ppc see
/archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00560.html (10,402 bytes)

11. Re: kio on non-x86 (score: 1)
Author: Chaitanya Tumuluri <chait@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 08:38:18 -0500 (EST)
Hi, Do you have the error messages? AFAIK, kiobuf code is _not_ arch specific. There are no arch specific components to the kiobuf code. Though, if you are using more than 1GB there may be an issue w
/archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00561.html (9,359 bytes)

12. Re: kio on non-x86 (score: 1)
Author: Thomas Graichen <news-innominate.list.sgi.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2 Mar 2001 16:55:43 GMT
none so far - but i did not have any of the debugging options turned on (no idea if they would help - maybe not) 128MB - so no problem here (also keep in mind this is on ppc not i386) more later - th
/archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00562.html (10,312 bytes)

13. Re: kio on non-x86 (score: 1)
Author: Chaitanya Tumuluri <chait@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 09:18:37 -0500 (EST)
I was angling for dmesg type outputs that'd indicate drive specific info. if any. Gah! Not enough coffee...too early...I _did_ have i386 in mind. :^) Cheers, -Chait.
/archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00563.html (7,767 bytes)

14. Re: kio on non-x86 (score: 1)
Author: Thomas Graichen <news-innominate.list.sgi.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2 Mar 2001 20:35:38 GMT
ok - i nailed it down further - looks like it's not a problem with XFS but more with the ide driver (ide-pmac.c) ... tried it with an usb floppy drive (which uses usb-storage and thus an scsi layer)
/archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00566.html (8,811 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu