Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*link\s+error\s+building\s+kernel\s+with\s+gcc\-3\.3\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*link\s+error\s+building\s+kernel\s+with\s+gcc\-3\.3\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: link error building kernel with gcc-3.3 (score: 1): Author: m@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 15:38:15 +1000 (EST); I wonder, does this mean that the compiler failed to inline the function? Removing __inline__ is not the correct solution. - James -- James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; /archives/netdev/2003-05/msg00136.html (8,014 bytes)
2. Re: link error building kernel with gcc-3.3 (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 22:42:14 -0700 (PDT); From: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 15:38:15 +1000 (EST) I wonder, does this mean that the compiler failed to inline the function? Removing __inline__ is not the corr; /archives/netdev/2003-05/msg00137.html (8,347 bytes)
3. Re: link error building kernel with gcc-3.3 (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 07:56:33 -0700 (PDT); Can you push it to 2.4.x as well? -Alex __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com; /archives/netdev/2003-05/msg00140.html (8,123 bytes)
4. Re: link error building kernel with gcc-3.3 (score: 1): Author: 41@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 13:11:01 -0700 (PDT); Can you push it to 2.4.x as well? I did, but it won't go in until 2.4.22-pre1, this isn't critical at all.; /archives/netdev/2003-05/msg00141.html (7,909 bytes)
5. Re: link error building kernel with gcc-3.3 (score: 1): Author: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 15:38:15 +1000 (EST); I wonder, does this mean that the compiler failed to inline the function? Removing __inline__ is not the correct solution. - James -- James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; /archives/netdev/2003-05/msg00538.html (8,076 bytes)
6. Re: link error building kernel with gcc-3.3 (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 22:42:14 -0700 (PDT); From: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 15:38:15 +1000 (EST) I wonder, does this mean that the compiler failed to inline the function? Removing __inline__ is not the corr; /archives/netdev/2003-05/msg00539.html (8,505 bytes)
7. Re: link error building kernel with gcc-3.3 (score: 1): Author: Alex Davis <alex14641@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 07:56:33 -0700 (PDT); Can you push it to 2.4.x as well? -Alex __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com; /archives/netdev/2003-05/msg00542.html (8,176 bytes)
8. Re: link error building kernel with gcc-3.3 (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 13:11:01 -0700 (PDT); Can you push it to 2.4.x as well? I did, but it won't go in until 2.4.22-pre1, this isn't critical at all.; /archives/netdev/2003-05/msg00543.html (8,015 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]