Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*mkfs\.xfs\s+option\s+for\s+RAID\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*mkfs\.xfs\s+option\s+for\s+RAID\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. mkfs.xfs option for RAID (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 17:03:56 +0900; For maximam performance and efficient performance, EXT2 file systems can be built with "-b" & "-R stride= " options. For instance, to match a normal RAID controller's 64KB default stripe size, the c; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01134.html (7,148 bytes)
2. Re: mkfs.xfs option for RAID (score: 1): Author: o@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 07:26:27 -0400; Yes! In fact, mkfs.xfs "notices" if the block device is LVM or RAID, and sets it's parameters automatically. FYI, they are: sunit - stripe unit size in 512 byte blocks swidth - stripe width size in 5; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01135.html (8,301 bytes)
3. Re: mkfs.xfs option for RAID (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 13:20:58 +0200; Are you sure it works for MD automatically too? When I'm reading the code correctly only LVM_BLK_MAJOR is checked for. -Andi; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01136.html (8,533 bytes)
4. Re: mkfs.xfs option for RAID (score: 1): Author: <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 07:41:47 -0400; No, I'm not sure. It's worked for me correctly in the past, but I've not updated from CVS lately. Russell? -- "Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01137.html (8,240 bytes)
5. Re: mkfs.xfs option for RAID (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 08:46:59 -0500; There is mkfs code in there for querying MD devices: /* MD volume */ if (sb.st_rdev >> 8 == MD_MAJOR) { int fd; /* Open device */ fd = open (dfile, O_RDONLY); if (fd == -1) return; /* Is this thing; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01139.html (8,913 bytes)
6. Re: mkfs.xfs option for RAID (score: 1): Author: ord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 16:15:01 +0200; [...] Looks like my cmd CVS checkout was hosed. After deleting and checking out again the code is in there. Thanks for clarifying, -Andi; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01141.html (8,506 bytes)
7. mkfs.xfs option for RAID (score: 1): Author: <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 17:03:56 +0900; For maximam performance and efficient performance, EXT2 file systems can be built with "-b" & "-R stride= " options. For instance, to match a normal RAID controller's 64KB default stripe size, the c; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg02498.html (7,148 bytes)
8. Re: mkfs.xfs option for RAID (score: 1): Author: Hattori" <tomo@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 07:26:27 -0400; Yes! In fact, mkfs.xfs "notices" if the block device is LVM or RAID, and sets it's parameters automatically. FYI, they are: sunit - stripe unit size in 512 byte blocks swidth - stripe width size in 5; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg02499.html (8,301 bytes)
9. Re: mkfs.xfs option for RAID (score: 1): Author: <danscox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 13:20:58 +0200; Are you sure it works for MD automatically too? When I'm reading the code correctly only LVM_BLK_MAJOR is checked for. -Andi; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg02500.html (8,533 bytes)
10. Re: mkfs.xfs option for RAID (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 07:41:47 -0400; No, I'm not sure. It's worked for me correctly in the past, but I've not updated from CVS lately. Russell? -- "Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg02501.html (8,240 bytes)
11. Re: mkfs.xfs option for RAID (score: 1): Author: <btenison@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 08:46:59 -0500; There is mkfs code in there for querying MD devices: /* MD volume */ if (sb.st_rdev >> 8 == MD_MAJOR) { int fd; /* Open device */ fd = open (dfile, O_RDONLY); if (fd == -1) return; /* Is this thing; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg02503.html (8,913 bytes)
12. Re: mkfs.xfs option for RAID (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 16:15:01 +0200; [...] Looks like my cmd CVS checkout was hosed. After deleting and checking out again the code is in there. Thanks for clarifying, -Andi; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg02505.html (8,506 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]