Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*new\s+2\.4\.24\s+kernel\s+out\s+\-\s+w\/o\s+XFS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*new\s+2\.4\.24\s+kernel\s+out\s+\-\s+w\/o\s+XFS\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. new 2.4.24 kernel out - w/o XFS (score: 1): Author: Dirk Hufnagel <hufnagel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 11:02:09 -0500; Looks like the 2.4.24-pre kernels have been removed and a new 2.4.24 kernel has been released, with a *very* short Changelog compared to 2.4.23. Possibly a reaction to the latest kernel security vuln; /archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00062.html (7,593 bytes)
2. Re: new 2.4.24 kernel out - w/o XFS (score: 1): Author: Juri Haberland <juri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 17:24:29 +0100; Yep, Marcello said that all changes that are present in the 2.4.24-pre kernels are postponed due to the recent security issues and will re-appear in the 2.4.25-pre patches. I do appreaciate this step; /archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00063.html (8,081 bytes)
3. Re: new 2.4.24 kernel out - w/o XFS (score: 1): Author: Robert Brockway <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 11:42:53 -0500 (EST); This was discussed on some other lists. It looks like Marcelo keeps a seperate tree with just critial updates in order to be able to push out a new kernel quickly in an emergency. I think this is an; /archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00064.html (8,434 bytes)
4. Re: new 2.4.24 kernel out - w/o XFS (score: 1): Author: Karol Kozimor <sziwan@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 18:10:08 +0100; Thus wrote Robert Brockway: Especially that it is doubtful that the 2.4.25 is delayed more than 2.4.24 would be. Best regards, -- Karol 'sziwan' Kozimor sziwan@xxxxxxxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00067.html (8,188 bytes)
5. Re: new 2.4.24 kernel out - w/o XFS (score: 1): Author: Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 09:06:16 +0800; The available split patches for 2.4.23 (2003-12-01 00:33 UTC) apply fairly cleanly to the pristine 2.4.24. The only reject is the Makefile EXTRAVERSION change, which is trivial to repair by hand. I h; /archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00099.html (8,861 bytes)
6. Re: new 2.4.24 kernel out - w/o XFS (score: 1): Author: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 22:41:14 -0900; and only if you apply -misc, which is not even required. ive read the entire diff of 2.4.23 -> 2.4.24, see for yourself, its VERY trivial stuff, XFS requires no changes. summary: * one line memset(); /archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00100.html (9,840 bytes)
7. new 2.4.24 kernel out - w/o XFS (score: 1): Author: Dirk Hufnagel <hufnagel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 11:02:09 -0500; Ma; /archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00428.html (7,593 bytes)
8. Re: new 2.4.24 kernel out - w/o XFS (score: 1): Author: Juri Haberland <juri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 17:24:29 +0100; uln; /archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00429.html (8,081 bytes)
9. Re: new 2.4.24 kernel out - w/o XFS (score: 1): Author: Robert Brockway <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 11:42:53 -0500 (EST); tep; /archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00430.html (8,434 bytes)
10. Re: new 2.4.24 kernel out - w/o XFS (score: 1): Author: Karol Kozimor <sziwan@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 18:10:08 +0100; err; /archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00433.html (8,188 bytes)
11. Re: new 2.4.24 kernel out - w/o XFS (score: 1): Author: Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 09:06:16 +0800; thi; /archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00465.html (8,861 bytes)
12. Re: new 2.4.24 kernel out - w/o XFS (score: 1): Author: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 22:41:14 -0900; I h; /archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00466.html (9,840 bytes)
13. new 2.4.24 kernel out - w/o XFS (score: 1): Author: Dirk Hufnagel <hufnagel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 11:02:09 -0500; Looks like the 2.4.24-pre kernels have been removed and a new 2.4.24 kernel has been released, with a *very* short Changelog compared to 2.4.23. Possibly a reaction to the latest kernel security vuln; /archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00794.html (7,479 bytes)
14. Re: new 2.4.24 kernel out - w/o XFS (score: 1): Author: Juri Haberland <juri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 17:24:29 +0100; Yep, Marcello said that all changes that are present in the 2.4.24-pre kernels are postponed due to the recent security issues and will re-appear in the 2.4.25-pre patches. I do appreaciate this step; /archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00795.html (8,129 bytes)
15. Re: new 2.4.24 kernel out - w/o XFS (score: 1): Author: Robert Brockway <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 11:42:53 -0500 (EST); This was discussed on some other lists. It looks like Marcelo keeps a seperate tree with just critial updates in order to be able to push out a new kernel quickly in an emergency. I think this is an; /archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00796.html (8,497 bytes)
16. Re: new 2.4.24 kernel out - w/o XFS (score: 1): Author: Karol Kozimor <sziwan@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 18:10:08 +0100; Thus wrote Robert Brockway: Especially that it is doubtful that the 2.4.25 is delayed more than 2.4.24 would be. Best regards, -- Karol 'sziwan' Kozimor sziwan@xxxxxxxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00799.html (8,292 bytes)
17. Re: new 2.4.24 kernel out - w/o XFS (score: 1): Author: Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 09:06:16 +0800; The available split patches for 2.4.23 (2003-12-01 00:33 UTC) apply fairly cleanly to the pristine 2.4.24. The only reject is the Makefile EXTRAVERSION change, which is trivial to repair by hand. I h; /archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00831.html (8,924 bytes)
18. Re: new 2.4.24 kernel out - w/o XFS (score: 1): Author: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 22:41:14 -0900; and only if you apply -misc, which is not even required. ive read the entire diff of 2.4.23 -> 2.4.24, see for yourself, its VERY trivial stuff, XFS requires no changes. summary: * one line memset(); /archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00832.html (9,939 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]