Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*node\-local\s+multicast\s+issues\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*node\-local\s+multicast\s+issues\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. node-local multicast issues (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 12:21:40 +0200; Hello all I am doing some experiments with node-local multicasting as a means of inter-process communication. I am using debian unstable with linux kernel 2.6.8 with MIPL 2.0 patches. Now I am runnin; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00331.html (8,750 bytes)
2. Re: node-local multicast issues (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 15:21:54 -0800; The loopback device doesn't have IFF_MULTICAST set, so technically it is not a multicast-capable device, and you shouldn't be able to join a group on it. I think the way it ought to work is that you; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00358.html (8,139 bytes)
3. Re: node-local multicast issues (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 16:17:31 +0200; Each interface joins the solicited multicast address and the link-local all-nodes multicast addresses (e.g. fe80::1:ff01:6317 and ff02::1, respectively, on the link the interface is attached). In add; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00398.html (10,059 bytes)
4. Re: node-local multicast issues (score: 1): Author: na Kumar <kumarkr@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 14:46:34 -0500; Mark Borst wrote: On another note: 'ping6 ff02::1' gives "connect: Invalid argument" on linux. You've got to use -I with that, maybe ping6 could give a hint. The only implementation that gives me rep; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00406.html (8,472 bytes)
5. Re: node-local multicast issues (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 12:18:24 +0200; I found that too. With -I it works fine. Good ;) My testing wasn't anything near exhaustive, just a short test ;) -- Mark Borst Researcher Network and Protocols Group Tampere University of Technology; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00428.html (8,277 bytes)
6. Re: node-local multicast issues (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxx; Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 13:21:53 +0200; It's a pity that I have to reply to myself. My tests show that interface-local multicast actually works, when I get my implementation right. So interface-local multicast on 'lo' does work. However, p; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00429.html (10,353 bytes)
7. node-local multicast issues (score: 1): Author: Mark Borst <mark@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 12:21:40 +0200; Hello all I am doing some experiments with node-local multicasting as a means of inter-process communication. I am using debian unstable with linux kernel 2.6.8 with MIPL 2.0 patches. Now I am runnin; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01385.html (8,750 bytes)
8. Re: node-local multicast issues (score: 1): Author: David Stevens <dlstevens@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 15:21:54 -0800; The loopback device doesn't have IFF_MULTICAST set, so technically it is not a multicast-capable device, and you shouldn't be able to join a group on it. I think the way it ought to work is that you; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01412.html (8,199 bytes)
9. Re: node-local multicast issues (score: 1): Author: Mark Borst <mark@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 16:17:31 +0200; Each interface joins the solicited multicast address and the link-local all-nodes multicast addresses (e.g. fe80::1:ff01:6317 and ff02::1, respectively, on the link the interface is attached). In add; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01452.html (10,189 bytes)
10. Re: node-local multicast issues (score: 1): Author: Brian Haley <Brian.Haley@xxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 14:46:34 -0500; On another note: 'ping6 ff02::1' gives "connect: Invalid argument" on linux. You've got to use -I with that, maybe ping6 could give a hint. The only implementation that gives me replies is Solaris.; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01460.html (8,631 bytes)
11. Re: node-local multicast issues (score: 1): Author: Mark Borst <mark@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 12:18:24 +0200; I found that too. With -I it works fine. Good ;) My testing wasn't anything near exhaustive, just a short test ;) -- Mark Borst Researcher Network and Protocols Group Tampere University of Technology; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01482.html (8,450 bytes)
12. Re: node-local multicast issues (score: 1): Author: Mark Borst <mark@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 13:21:53 +0200; It's a pity that I have to reply to myself. My tests show that interface-local multicast actually works, when I get my implementation right. So interface-local multicast on 'lo' does work. However, p; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01483.html (10,538 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]