Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*oss\.sgi\.com\s+and\s+mailman\,\s+looking\s+for\s+volunteers\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*oss\.sgi\.com\s+and\s+mailman\,\s+looking\s+for\s+volunteers\.\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. s_iunlinks (score: 1): Author: wald <ms@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 09:25:33 -0500; I've set up mailman on oss in an effort to dump the current list handling software (ecartis), which has been causing us fits for a while now. I would be helpful if a few people would sign up to the n; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00685.html (8,990 bytes)
2. log_recover_process_iunlinks (score: 1): Author: andeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:50:31 +1100; What is the point? Let's just move the list to vger.kernel.org and we can forget about all these problems.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00689.html (9,275 bytes)
3. rgent queue (score: 1): Author: avid@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:30:53 -0400; Yeah. ecartis is just part of the problem. barracuda is another at least as big problem, and I guess there are many other hiding.; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00693.html (8,599 bytes)
4. �дников) офисное помещение (score: 1): Author: <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:42:02 -0500; I suppose that this is sgi's decision in the end ;) Any comment from those folks? -Eric; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00694.html (9,088 bytes)
5. feature (score: 1): Author: n <npiggin@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:12:20 +1100; Eric Sandeen wrote: Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 08:50:31AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: What is the point? Let's just move the list to vger.kernel.org and we can forget about all t; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00696.html (10,576 bytes)
6. ] writeback data integrity and other fixes (take 3) (score: 1): Author: y <lachlan@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 20:02:41 -0500; Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 08:50:31AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: What is the point? Let's just move the list to vger.kernel.org and we can forget about all these problems.... Ye; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00699.html (9,701 bytes)
7. e: [PATCH 0/3 v3] hook xfs to fiemap ioctl (score: 1): Author: ttelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:18:28 +1100; Russell Cattelan wrote: Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 08:50:31AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: What is the point? Let's just move the list to vger.kernel.org and we can forget about a; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00700.html (10,975 bytes)
8. attr and -d options (score: 1): Author: y <lachlan@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:06:19 +1100; Russell Cattelan wrote: If everything works out then I will move the entire list over to using mailman. Or over to vger, as we've been discussing. I'd like to delay any significant change until (a) a; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00733.html (9,609 bytes)
9. s_getbmap to take formatter functions (score: 1): Author: avid@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:25:02 +1100; That's already been set up on xfs.org. We don't need to duplicate that again, do we? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00735.html (9,723 bytes)
10. ] remove restricted_chown parameter (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 09:25:33 -0500; I've set up mailman on oss in an effort to dump the current list handling software (ecartis), which has been causing us fits for a while now. I would be helpful if a few people would sign up to the n; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg01543.html (8,807 bytes)
11. t xfs_read_agf helper (score: 1): Author: xxx>; Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:50:31 +1100; What is the point? Let's just move the list to vger.kernel.org and we can forget about all these problems.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg01547.html (9,096 bytes)
12. 4/7] kill xfs_ialloc_log_di (score: 1): Author: xxx>; Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:30:53 -0400; Yeah. ecartis is just part of the problem. barracuda is another at least as big problem, and I guess there are many other hiding.; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg01551.html (8,420 bytes)
13. eue (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:42:02 -0500; I suppose that this is sgi's decision in the end ;) Any comment from those folks? -Eric; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg01552.html (8,909 bytes)
14. ines (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:12:20 +1100; Eric Sandeen wrote: Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 08:50:31AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: What is the point? Let's just move the list to vger.kernel.org and we can forget about all t; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg01554.html (10,393 bytes)
15. e: Is it possible the check an frozen XFS filesytem to avoid downtime (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 20:02:41 -0500; Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 08:50:31AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: What is the point? Let's just move the list to vger.kernel.org and we can forget about all these problems.... Ye; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg01557.html (9,518 bytes)
16. o avoid downtime (score: 1): Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:18:28 +1100; Russell Cattelan wrote: Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 08:50:31AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: What is the point? Let's just move the list to vger.kernel.org and we can forget about a; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg01558.html (10,792 bytes)
17. PAM ***** Returned mail: see transcript for details (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:06:19 +1100; Russell Cattelan wrote: If everything works out then I will move the entire list over to using mailman. Or over to vger, as we've been discussing. I'd like to delay any significant change until (a) a; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg01591.html (9,426 bytes)
18. tegrity and other fixes (take 3) (score: 1): Author: xxx>; Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:25:02 +1100; That's already been set up on xfs.org. We don't need to duplicate that again, do we? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg01593.html (9,544 bytes)
19. oss.sgi.com and mailman, looking for volunteers. (score: 1): Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 09:25:33 -0500; I've set up mailman on oss in an effort to dump the current list handling software (ecartis), which has been causing us fits for a while now. I would be helpful if a few people would sign up to the n; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg02361.html (8,881 bytes)
20. Re: oss.sgi.com and mailman, looking for volunteers. (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:50:31 +1100; What is the point? Let's just move the list to vger.kernel.org and we can forget about all these problems.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg02365.html (9,159 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]