Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*poor\s+io\s+performance\s+with\s+xfs\+raid5\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*poor\s+io\s+performance\s+with\s+xfs\+raid5\s*$/: 42 ]

Total 42 documents matching your query.

41. Re: poor io performance with xfs+raid5 (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 07:30:46 -0400; And is also notorious for mediocre performance. It appears to have been implemented largely as a checkbox feature. Doing unaligned writes to a hardware RAID device can still be a problem, if the hard; /archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00976.html (10,581 bytes)
42. Re: poor io performance with xfs+raid5 (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 18:35:20 -0500; hi all, i thank you all for the feedback regarding my problem. after a good 18 hours of downtime (backing up 40GB of data from the xfs partition took most of that time), all of my i/o problems have d; /archives/xfs/2002-04/msg01046.html (9,731 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 42
Page: [1] [2] [3]