Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*question\s+on\s+xfs

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*question\s+on\s+xfs_repair\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. question on xfs_repair (score: 1): Author: <roberto@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 11:46:50 +0200 (CEST); I'm running slackware 8.1 with XFS 1.2.0 +acl+quota on kernel 2.4.19 + lvm 1.0.7. I've a question on xfs_repair. If I've ran xfs_check on my /var F.S. and I've got no warning messages, but if I run; /archives/xfs/2003-04/msg00164.html (8,867 bytes)
2. Re: question on xfs_repair (score: 1): Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 14 Apr 2003 11:31:27 -0500; You must have gotten a version of the rpms that has some debugging code that wasn't suppose to be released. Grab a fresh copy of the xfsprogs rpm/tar file. -- Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>; /archives/xfs/2003-04/msg00169.html (10,563 bytes)
3. Re: question on xfs_repair (score: 1): Author: <roberto@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 12:36:31 +0200 (CEST); I wanted to build from source. I've downloaded xfsprogs-2.3.5.src.tar.gz, check md5sum, untar it. cd into xfsprogs-2.3.5 red doc/INSTALL export DEBUG=-DNDEBUG (as you suggested) ./configure ./Makepkg; /archives/xfs/2003-04/msg00206.html (7,868 bytes)
4. Re: question on xfs_repair (score: 1): Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 16 Apr 2003 16:55:08 -0500; Looks like the cmd source tarballs might have been bad ... acl and attr were at the wrong version? I've re-upload the tar files from a generated from a freshly checked out tree so things should be al; /archives/xfs/2003-04/msg00227.html (10,581 bytes)
5. Re: question on xfs_repair (score: 1): Author: <roberto@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 09:59:40 +0200 (CEST); I downloaded the new xfsprogs-2.3.5 and repeated the rebuilding. Now xfs_repair does not show the same strange messages! it seems OK! Diffing the sources I found the only differences are: diff -r old; /archives/xfs/2003-04/msg00234.html (12,574 bytes)
6. question on xfs_repair (score: 1): Author:; Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 11:46:50 +0200 (CEST); g; /archives/xfs/2003-04/msg00550.html (8,867 bytes)
7. Re: question on xfs_repair (score: 1): Author:; Date: 14 Apr 2003 11:31:27 -0500; e; /archives/xfs/2003-04/msg00555.html (10,563 bytes)
8. Re: question on xfs_repair (score: 1): Author:; Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 12:36:31 +0200 (CEST); 5; /archives/xfs/2003-04/msg00592.html (7,868 bytes)
9. Re: question on xfs_repair (score: 1): Author:; Date: 16 Apr 2003 16:55:08 -0500; b; /archives/xfs/2003-04/msg00613.html (10,581 bytes)
10. Re: question on xfs_repair (score: 1): Author:; Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 09:59:40 +0200 (CEST); a; /archives/xfs/2003-04/msg00620.html (12,574 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]