- 1. ottleRate=0 (score: 1)
- Author: Dorn Hetzel <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 18:55:20 -0500
- nux-2.4.28-cap5p/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c Sun Dec
- /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00088.html (9,601 bytes)
- 2. TSO + e1000 (score: 1)
- Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 00:37:56 +0100
- se the e1000 driver is zeroing out the IP header length
- /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00090.html (8,688 bytes)
- 3. Re: r8169.c (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 19:44:11 -0500
- :
- /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00742.html (11,772 bytes)
- 4. Re: r8169.c (score: 1)
- Author: chmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 01:29:46 +0100
- e
- /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00744.html (12,223 bytes)
- 5. Re: r8169.c (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 13:13:07 -0500
- ".
- /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00817.html (10,559 bytes)
- 6. Re: r8169.c (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:49:01 -0500
- 20
- /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00846.html (9,703 bytes)
- 7. Re: r8169.c (score: 1)
- Author: Haley <Brian.Haley@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 20:47:40 +0100
- 017
- /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00856.html (8,817 bytes)
- 8. Re: r8169.c (score: 1)
- Author: bert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 15:00:22 -0500
- and
- /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00915.html (9,812 bytes)
- 9. Re: r8169.c (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 17:02:33 -0500
- int
- /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00917.html (9,412 bytes)
- 10. Re: r8169.c (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 21:54:11 +0100
- is
- /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00919.html (9,031 bytes)
- 11. γΌγ³ζιδΈοΌβ (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 19:36:14 -0500
- 9zc
- /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00922.html (9,685 bytes)
- 12. Re: r8169.c (score: 1)
- Author: Dorn Hetzel <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 18:55:20 -0500
- I was wondering if the above 4 patches have made it into one of the rc? releases, or at least a rc?-mm? ? Regards, -Dorn
- /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg01039.html (10,007 bytes)
- 13. Re: r8169.c (score: 1)
- Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 00:37:56 +0100
- Dorn Hetzel <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : [...] They need to apply on top of -netdev which is included in -mm. I'll send the patch for inclusion in -mm so there is no need for Jeff to hurry. -- Ueimor
- /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg01041.html (9,037 bytes)
- 14. Re: r8169.c (score: 1)
- Author: Dorn Hetzel <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 19:44:11 -0500
- Thank you very much for the pointers. I have been using Linux for ages (well, since 1993 anyway), but this is my first attempt at fixing something in the kernel. (first time I've needed to :) ) I'm o
- /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01796.html (11,907 bytes)
- 15. Re: r8169.c (score: 1)
- Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 01:29:46 +0100
- Dorn Hetzel <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : [...] You have two options (or more) on top of 2.6.10-rc2: - ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.10-rc2/2.6.10-rc2-mm2/2.6.10-rc2-
- /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01798.html (12,608 bytes)
- 16. Re: r8169.c (score: 1)
- Author: Dorn Hetzel <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 13:13:07 -0500
- illyria kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out illyria kernel: eth0: interrupt 0001 taken in poll Then things go south pretty hard and fast... I'll try the other patches on top of rc2-mm2
- /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01871.html (10,898 bytes)
- 17. Re: r8169.c (score: 1)
- Author: Dorn Hetzel <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:49:01 -0500
- Stacked on these 4 patches and things seem much better :) This is on an Abit AA8 Duramax motherboard. -Dorn
- /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01900.html (10,025 bytes)
- 18. Re: r8169.c (score: 1)
- Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 20:47:40 +0100
- Dorn Hetzel <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : [...] [...] [...] [...] [...] [...] [...] [...] [...] Did you change the compiler as well ? If yes, it would be nice to know if the system performs correctly wh
- /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01910.html (9,110 bytes)
- 19. Re: r8169.c (score: 1)
- Author: Dorn Hetzel <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 15:00:22 -0500
- Yes, I moved to gcc 3.4.3. I'm out of town for the Thanksgiving holiday, but I will revert the compiler and test again as soon as I get home (early next week). Do you know when the 250-265 patches wi
- /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01969.html (10,165 bytes)
- 20. Re: r8169.c (score: 1)
- Author: Dorn Hetzel <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 17:02:33 -0500
- I went ahead and remotely rebuilt using gcc 2.95.4 and upon reboot it worked long enough to ssh in and then it failed. So it sounds like the version of gcc DOES make a difference :) I will report fur
- /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01971.html (9,735 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu