Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*race\s+in\s+unmount\s+code\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*race\s+in\s+unmount\s+code\.\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. race in unmount code. (score: 1): Author: Daniel Moore <dxm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 16:01:29 +1000; I finally found a way of tickling an problem I've been seeing every-so-often during my testing: yes cat /proc/mounts | tcsh & mount /dev/hda6 /mnt/arch0 -t xfs ; umount /dev/hda6 ; kill % (one line -; /archives/xfs/2000-05/msg00103.html (7,473 bytes)
2. Re: race in unmount code. (score: 1): Author: "Andi Kleen" <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 10:57:54 +0200; The vfsmnt stuff is very new in linux -- it was introduced only a few patchlevels before the XFS kernel branched. So it is entirely possible that the generic code is buggy. Maybe this patch will help; /archives/xfs/2000-05/msg00104.html (8,395 bytes)
3. Re: race in unmount code. (score: 1): Author: Daniel Moore <dxm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 11:49:37 +1000; => The vfsmnt stuff is very new in linux -- it was introduced only a few => patchlevels before the XFS kernel branched. So it is entirely possible => that the generic code is buggy. Maybe this patch; /archives/xfs/2000-05/msg00117.html (8,108 bytes)
4. race in unmount code. (score: 1): Author: Daniel Moore <dxm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 16:01:29 +1000; I finally found a way of tickling an problem I've been seeing every-so-often during my testing: yes cat /proc/mounts | tcsh & mount /dev/hda6 /mnt/arch0 -t xfs ; umount /dev/hda6 ; kill % (one line -; /archives/xfs/2000-05/msg00375.html (7,473 bytes)
5. Re: race in unmount code. (score: 1): Author: "Andi Kleen" <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 10:57:54 +0200; The vfsmnt stuff is very new in linux -- it was introduced only a few patchlevels before the XFS kernel branched. So it is entirely possible that the generic code is buggy. Maybe this patch will help; /archives/xfs/2000-05/msg00376.html (8,395 bytes)
6. Re: race in unmount code. (score: 1): Author: Daniel Moore <dxm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 11:49:37 +1000; => The vfsmnt stuff is very new in linux -- it was introduced only a few => patchlevels before the XFS kernel branched. So it is entirely possible => that the generic code is buggy. Maybe this patch; /archives/xfs/2000-05/msg00389.html (8,108 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]