Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*review\:\s+xfstests\/016\s+change\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. n values. (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 13:29:27 +1000
Hi there, xfstests/016 has been failing for a while in many cases. It was relying on the log traffic for create/rm to be unaltered in XFS over the life of XFS. Its initial purpose was to test out the
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00046.html (11,569 bytes)

2. in QA 122 (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 01:54:46 -0400
I get four rejects out of four hunk when trying to apply this patch, looks like whitespace-damage.
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00049.html (8,333 bytes)

3. n values. (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 16:19:54 +1000
Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 01:29:27PM +1000, Timothy Shimmin wrote: Hi there, xfstests/016 has been failing for a while in many cases. It was relying on the log traffic for crea
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00054.html (12,473 bytes)

4. M old ABI (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 14:31:22 -0400
Still fails for me with that patch applied: 016 43s ... - output mismatch (see 016.out.bad) 13a14,17 Failures: 016 Failed 1 of 1 tests
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00061.html (8,288 bytes)

5. 016.patch (score: 1)
Author: x
Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 11:29:57 +1000
Forgot adding 016.out change to patch. The failure diff above means it worked ;-) --Tim
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00066.html (8,522 bytes)

6. th down_try(), reverse return values. (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 13:29:27 +1000
down_try() (which makes mor
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00530.html (11,569 bytes)

7. upport for sb_bad_features2 in QA 122 (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 01:54:46 -0400
ures that came up recently?
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00533.html (8,333 bytes)

8. th down_try(), reverse return values. (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 16:19:54 +1000
ving one stand out would be
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00538.html (12,473 bytes)

9. 2 shortform structures on ARM old ABI (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 14:31:22 -0400
... I can resend too. -Eric
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00545.html (8,288 bytes)

10. der:3, mode:0x4020) (score: 1)
Author: xxx
Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 11:29:57 +1000
etions(-) == Index: xfstest
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00550.html (8,522 bytes)

11. review: xfstests/016 change (score: 1)
Author: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 13:29:27 +1000
Hi there, xfstests/016 has been failing for a while in many cases. It was relying on the log traffic for create/rm to be unaltered in XFS over the life of XFS. Its initial purpose was to test out the
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg01014.html (11,035 bytes)

12. Re: review: xfstests/016 change (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 01:54:46 -0400
I get four rejects out of four hunk when trying to apply this patch, looks like whitespace-damage.
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg01017.html (8,381 bytes)

13. Re: review: xfstests/016 change (score: 1)
Author: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 16:19:54 +1000
xfstests/016 has been failing for a while in many cases. It was relying on the log traffic for create/rm to be unaltered in XFS over the life of XFS. Its initial purpose was to test out the writing o
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg01022.html (12,459 bytes)

14. Re: review: xfstests/016 change (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 14:31:22 -0400
Still fails for me with that patch applied: 016 43s ... - output mismatch (see 016.out.bad) 13a14,17 Failures: 016 Failed 1 of 1 tests
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg01029.html (8,390 bytes)

15. Re: review: xfstests/016 change (score: 1)
Author: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 11:29:57 +1000
Forgot adding 016.out change to patch. The failure diff above means it worked ;-) --Tim
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg01034.html (8,660 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu