Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*review\:\s+xfstests\/192\s+atime\s+test\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Re: review: xfstests/192 atime test (score: 1)
Author: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 15:52:08 +1100
/archives/xfs/2008-12/msg00233.html (8,621 bytes)

2. Re: review: xfstests/192 atime test (score: 1)
Author: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 15:52:08 +1100
b
/archives/xfs/2008-12/msg00850.html (8,621 bytes)

3. review: xfstests/192 atime test (score: 1)
Author: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:11:16 +1100
Attached simple atime test. 192.out and group file would be added appropriately. Thanks. --Tim owner=tes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx seq=`basename $0` echo "QA output created by $seq" here=`pwd` tmp=/tmp/$
/archives/xfs/2008-11/msg00060.html (8,008 bytes)

4. Re: review: xfstests/192 atime test (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:38:10 +1100
150s sleep? It only needs a few seconds for this test. Why bother with deltas? if the numbers are the same, just output "same", if they are different, output "different".... FWIW, is there a patch be
/archives/xfs/2008-11/msg00064.html (8,344 bytes)

5. Re: review: xfstests/192 atime test (score: 1)
Author: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:22:50 +1100
Not for me. Passed every time at a few secs, that is why I tried longer as was originally reported. Fine, will do. I lost the thread with people to'ing and fro'ing ;-) I'd have to relook at the last
/archives/xfs/2008-11/msg00065.html (8,524 bytes)

6. Re: review: xfstests/192 atime test (score: 1)
Author: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:36:41 +1100
The only other thing is that I am not just testing the bug as it stands - i.e. if the atime is being lost on-disk. I want to test that the atime is updated appropriately. --Tim
/archives/xfs/2008-11/msg00066.html (8,831 bytes)

7. review: xfstests/192 atime test (score: 1)
Author: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:11:16 +1100
Attached simple atime test. 192.out and group file would be added appropriately. Thanks. --Tim owner=tes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx seq=`basename $0` echo "QA output created by $seq" here=`pwd` tmp=/tmp/$
/archives/xfs/2008-11/msg00378.html (8,008 bytes)

8. Re: review: xfstests/192 atime test (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:38:10 +1100
150s sleep? It only needs a few seconds for this test. Why bother with deltas? if the numbers are the same, just output "same", if they are different, output "different".... FWIW, is there a patch be
/archives/xfs/2008-11/msg00382.html (8,344 bytes)

9. Re: review: xfstests/192 atime test (score: 1)
Author: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:22:50 +1100
Not for me. Passed every time at a few secs, that is why I tried longer as was originally reported. Fine, will do. I lost the thread with people to'ing and fro'ing ;-) I'd have to relook at the last
/archives/xfs/2008-11/msg00383.html (8,524 bytes)

10. Re: review: xfstests/192 atime test (score: 1)
Author: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:36:41 +1100
The only other thing is that I am not just testing the bug as it stands - i.e. if the atime is being lost on-disk. I want to test that the atime is updated appropriately. --Tim
/archives/xfs/2008-11/msg00384.html (8,831 bytes)

11. Re: review: xfstests/192 atime test (score: 1)
Author: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 15:52:08 +1100
Ping? Not fussed? Thanks, --Tim
/archives/xfs/2008-12/msg01467.html (8,886 bytes)

12. review: xfstests/192 atime test (score: 1)
Author: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:11:16 +1100
Attached simple atime test. 192.out and group file would be added appropriately. Thanks. --Tim owner=tes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx seq=`basename $0` echo "QA output created by $seq" here=`pwd` tmp=/tmp/$
/archives/xfs/2008-11/msg00696.html (8,008 bytes)

13. Re: review: xfstests/192 atime test (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:38:10 +1100
150s sleep? It only needs a few seconds for this test. Why bother with deltas? if the numbers are the same, just output "same", if they are different, output "different".... FWIW, is there a patch be
/archives/xfs/2008-11/msg00700.html (8,392 bytes)

14. Re: review: xfstests/192 atime test (score: 1)
Author: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:22:50 +1100
Not for me. Passed every time at a few secs, that is why I tried longer as was originally reported. Fine, will do. I lost the thread with people to'ing and fro'ing ;-) I'd have to relook at the last
/archives/xfs/2008-11/msg00701.html (8,662 bytes)

15. Re: review: xfstests/192 atime test (score: 1)
Author: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:36:41 +1100
The only other thing is that I am not just testing the bug as it stands - i.e. if the atime is being lost on-disk. I want to test that the atime is updated appropriately. --Tim
/archives/xfs/2008-11/msg00702.html (8,960 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu