Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*shutting\s+down\s+f\/s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*shutting\s+down\s+f\/s\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. shutting down f/s (score: 1): Author: Krzysztof Rusocki <kszysiu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 13:56:18 +0200; I witnessed xfs_force_shutdown doing its best yesterday ;-) I was trying to untarbz2 little damaged .tbz2 archive (xaa+xab+xad+xac .... wrongfully connected files after split -b). Since it occured o; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00078.html (8,645 bytes)
2. Re: shutting down f/s (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 09:09:45 -0500; We've been seeing a couple people with this lately... it's probably not a memory problem, it may be an underlying XFS problem. xfs_repair may "fix" the problem, but it's throwing the baby out with th; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00080.html (8,320 bytes)
3. Re: shutting down f/s (score: 1): Author: David Rousseau <drousseau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 04 Oct 2001 16:21:07 +0200; le jeu 04-10-2001 at 16:09 Eric Sandeen a écrit : I had this problem on machine with the red hat kernel (2.4.2 and 2.4.3 RPMs, ac tree) but never on machines running under linux-2.4-xfs cvs versio; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00081.html (8,752 bytes)
4. Re: shutting down f/s (score: 1): Author: kris buggenhout <buggenkr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 16:31:41 +0200; Might this be related to shutdowns taking a long time to actually unmount fs... I noticed since I upped the kernel to an 2.4.10 release ( dont know the exact checkout) shutdowns hang on umount for a; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00082.html (8,968 bytes)
5. Re: shutting down f/s (score: 1): Author: Krzysztof Rusocki <kszysiu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 16:41:27 +0200; Hello Eric. Yes, i thought so... I can try it. Besides, as David mentioned, it won't make any harm if such patch is included in xfs/cvs tree, will it? Noone will be angry for that I hope :) Cheers, K; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00083.html (8,666 bytes)
6. Re: shutting down f/s (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 10:00:00 -0500; Hmm, thats a new one to me too, my shutdowns on all xfs boxes do not appear to have become any longer - however, the systems are not busy before the unmount usually. The new VM showed up later in th; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00084.html (10,201 bytes)
7. Re: shutting down f/s (score: 1): Author: kris buggenhout <buggenkr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 17:08:52 +0200; After a whole day of writing files / ftp logs / ftp data /archiving data on cd / removing data, . approx 1-3Gig/day. with some processes still holding a lock on that dir ( they should get killed befo; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00085.html (9,169 bytes)
8. Re: shutting down f/s (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 10:15:32 -0500; So this probably relates mostly to how the vm changes have affected flushing of data out to disk. Steve; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00086.html (9,264 bytes)
9. Re: shutting down f/s (score: 1): Author: kris buggenhout <kris.buggenhout@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 23:30:36 +0200; I suppose so, I am not that proficient in kernel hacking... ( i am not a coder) but it seems logical ... flushing to disks get's delayed... givven that I upgraded the memory too, 400M... which acount; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00101.html (10,067 bytes)
10. shutting down f/s (score: 1): Author: Krzysztof Rusocki <kszysiu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 13:56:18 +0200; f; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01158.html (8,645 bytes)
11. Re: shutting down f/s (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 09:09:45 -0500; o; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01160.html (8,320 bytes)
12. Re: shutting down f/s (score: 1): Author: David Rousseau <drousseau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 04 Oct 2001 16:21:07 +0200; h; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01161.html (8,752 bytes)
13. Re: shutting down f/s (score: 1): Author: kris buggenhout <buggenkr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 16:31:41 +0200; o; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01162.html (8,968 bytes)
14. Re: shutting down f/s (score: 1): Author: Krzysztof Rusocki <kszysiu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 16:41:27 +0200; a; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01163.html (8,666 bytes)
15. Re: shutting down f/s (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 10:00:00 -0500; K; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01164.html (10,201 bytes)
16. Re: shutting down f/s (score: 1): Author: kris buggenhout <buggenkr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 17:08:52 +0200; h; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01165.html (9,169 bytes)
17. Re: shutting down f/s (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 10:15:32 -0500; o; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01166.html (9,264 bytes)
18. Re: shutting down f/s (score: 1): Author: kris buggenhout <kris.buggenhout@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 23:30:36 +0200; -; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01181.html (10,067 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]