if I do: for I in 173 174 178; do ./check $I; done it's not terribly interesting, things seem to go ok, just normal filestreams failures ;-) if I do: ./check 173 174 178 things go very badly; the ver
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 14:39:28 +1000, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: if I do: for I in 173 174 178; do ./check $I; done it's not terribly interesting, things seem to go ok, just normal files
Barry - I think xfs_repair might be finding the incorrect superblock for the repair. Tests 172, 173 and 174 use less than the whole disk, so there are going to be stale superblocks all over the plac