Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*spam\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. spam (score: 1)
Author: "D. Stimits" <stimits@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 14:37:24 -0600
I'm forwarding something that apparently is from email harvesting. I doubt there is anything to be done to prevent spam harvesters, but considering how terrible it has become on gnu.org lists, I'll p
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00300.html (18,979 bytes)

2. Re: spam (score: 1)
Author: Juha Saarinen <juha@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 09:15:02 +1200 (NZST)
It didn't originate at a Japanese ISP -- if you look at the headers, the spammer appears to have used a Popsite dial-up. It might be a good idea if the linux-xfs list was set to use the MAPS DUL and
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00301.html (8,359 bytes)

3. Re: spam (score: 1)
Author: "D. Stimits" <stimits@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 16:29:09 -0600
Looking closer, I see that it was a "TO" address of Japan. More confusing is: Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx Does that mean there was an attempt to forge the header? Or maybe sgi is being used a
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00302.html (8,989 bytes)

4. Re: spam (score: 1)
Author: Juha Saarinen <juha@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:38:42 +1200 (NZST)
No, the spammer sent the crap to the linux-xfs list, which then redistributed it to all the subscribers. You need to work your way down the Received from: chain to find the originating MTA or sending
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00303.html (8,325 bytes)

5. Re: spam (score: 1)
Author: "Bernhard R. Erdmann" <be@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 00:38:49 +0200
The From: line is forged, too. Look at the Received: lines: Received: from mail.sidac.co.jp (dns.sidac.co.jp [211.6.163.50]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id f68KIuV15580 for <linux-xfs@x
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00304.html (8,229 bytes)

6. Re: spam (score: 1)
Author: "D. Stimits" <stimits@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 16:55:39 -0600
You probably can't hear it, but I am cheering now. D. Stimits, stimits@xxxxxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00306.html (8,873 bytes)

7. Re: spam (score: 1)
Author: Juha Saarinen <juha@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:55:27 +1200 (NZST)
Don't... it'll likely be a "whack-a-mole" cheap dial-up account bought with a stolen credit card number. The spammer will just get new ones... -- Regards, Juha PGP fingerprint: B7E1 CC52 5FCA 9756 B5
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00307.html (7,598 bytes)

8. Re: spam (score: 1)
Author: "Orn E. Hansen" <oe.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 01:22:11 +0200
mánudagur 9. júlí 2001 00:55, Juha Saarinen skrifađi: I don't know much about this stuff, but I always keep in mind an old saying "good or bad attention, as good advertisment if it catches attention"
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00309.html (8,194 bytes)

9. RE: spam (score: 1)
Author: "Juha Saarinen" <juha@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 11:25:42 +1200
Nope. I have no idea what he was spamvertising. I just looked at the headers and filed a complaint with Popsite. If everyone did that, email would be 99.9% spam. It's actually better to complain, an
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00310.html (7,795 bytes)

10. spam (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 14:37:24 -0600
I'm forwarding something that apparently is from email harvesting. I doubt there is anything to be done to prevent spam harvesters, but considering how terrible it has become on gnu.org lists, I'll p
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01591.html (18,979 bytes)

11. Re: spam (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 09:15:02 +1200 (NZST)
It didn't originate at a Japanese ISP -- if you look at the headers, the spammer appears to have used a Popsite dial-up. It might be a good idea if the linux-xfs list was set to use the MAPS DUL and
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01592.html (8,359 bytes)

12. Re: spam (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 16:29:09 -0600
Looking closer, I see that it was a "TO" address of Japan. More confusing is: Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx Does that mean there was an attempt to forge the header? Or maybe sgi is being used a
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01593.html (8,989 bytes)

13. Re: spam (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:38:42 +1200 (NZST)
No, the spammer sent the crap to the linux-xfs list, which then redistributed it to all the subscribers. You need to work your way down the Received from: chain to find the originating MTA or sending
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01594.html (8,325 bytes)

14. Re: spam (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 00:38:49 +0200
The From: line is forged, too. Look at the Received: lines: Received: from mail.sidac.co.jp (dns.sidac.co.jp [211.6.163.50]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id f68KIuV15580 for <linux-xfs@x
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01595.html (8,229 bytes)

15. Re: spam (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 16:55:39 -0600
You probably can't hear it, but I am cheering now. D. Stimits, stimits@xxxxxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01597.html (8,873 bytes)

16. Re: spam (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:55:27 +1200 (NZST)
Don't... it'll likely be a "whack-a-mole" cheap dial-up account bought with a stolen credit card number. The spammer will just get new ones... -- Regards, Juha PGP fingerprint: B7E1 CC52 5FCA 9756 B5
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01598.html (7,598 bytes)

17. Re: spam (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 01:22:11 +0200
mánudagur 9. júlí 2001 00:55, Juha Saarinen skrifađi: I don't know much about this stuff, but I always keep in mind an old saying "good or bad attention, as good advertisment if it catches attention"
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01600.html (8,194 bytes)

18. RE: spam (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 11:25:42 +1200
Nope. I have no idea what he was spamvertising. I just looked at the headers and filed a complaint with Popsite. If everyone did that, email would be 99.9% spam. It's actually better to complain, an
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01601.html (7,795 bytes)

19. spam (score: 1)
Author: "D. Stimits" <stimits@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 14:37:24 -0600
I'm forwarding something that apparently is from email harvesting. I doubt there is anything to be done to prevent spam harvesters, but considering how terrible it has become on gnu.org lists, I'll p
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02882.html (18,979 bytes)

20. Re: spam (score: 1)
Author: Juha Saarinen <juha@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 09:15:02 +1200 (NZST)
It didn't originate at a Japanese ISP -- if you look at the headers, the spammer appears to have used a Popsite dial-up. It might be a good idea if the linux-xfs list was set to use the MAPS DUL and
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02883.html (8,384 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu