Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*strange\s+output\s+from\s+df\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*strange\s+output\s+from\s+df\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. strange output from df (score: 1): Author: Christian Gottschalch <gottschalch@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 16:19:31 +0200 (MET DST); i've run some checks on xfs: two x1 do the work over a mounted nfs Volume simultaneously creation test: 10000 fiels in 10000 Directorys copy these files to another directory move all to anotehr Direc; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00110.html (7,444 bytes)
2. Re: strange output from df (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 21:26:07 -0500; I assume that the "strange" part of the output is that your "empty" filesystem shows 108M used? This is probably because XFS dynamically allocates inodes as it needs them, and you just created 40,000; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00113.html (8,095 bytes)
3. Re: strange output from df (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 07:36:46 +0200 (CEST); Nothing is wrong. XFS allocates indoes when needed, once used you don't get the space back. On the other hand with ext2 you allocate the same amount of space when you format the partion Cheer Seth; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00119.html (8,585 bytes)
4. strange output from df (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 16:19:31 +0200 (MET DST); i've run some checks on xfs: two x1 do the work over a mounted nfs Volume simultaneously creation test: 10000 fiels in 10000 Directorys copy these files to another directory move all to anotehr Direc; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01401.html (7,444 bytes)
5. Re: strange output from df (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 21:26:07 -0500; I assume that the "strange" part of the output is that your "empty" filesystem shows 108M used? This is probably because XFS dynamically allocates inodes as it needs them, and you just created 40,000; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01404.html (8,095 bytes)
6. Re: strange output from df (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 07:36:46 +0200 (CEST); Nothing is wrong. XFS allocates indoes when needed, once used you don't get the space back. On the other hand with ext2 you allocate the same amount of space when you format the partion Cheer Seth; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01410.html (8,585 bytes)
7. strange output from df (score: 1): Author: Christian Gottschalch <gottschalch@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 16:19:31 +0200 (MET DST); i've run some checks on xfs: two x1 do the work over a mounted nfs Volume simultaneously creation test: 10000 fiels in 10000 Directorys copy these files to another directory move all to anotehr Direc; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02692.html (7,444 bytes)
8. Re: strange output from df (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 21:26:07 -0500; I assume that the "strange" part of the output is that your "empty" filesystem shows 108M used? This is probably because XFS dynamically allocates inodes as it needs them, and you just created 40,000; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02695.html (8,143 bytes)
9. Re: strange output from df (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 07:36:46 +0200 (CEST); Nothing is wrong. XFS allocates indoes when needed, once used you don't get the space back. On the other hand with ext2 you allocate the same amount of space when you format the partion Cheer Seth; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02701.html (8,618 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]