Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*synctest\s+results\s+on\s+xfs\/ext3$htree$\s+on\s+2\.6\.5\-rc3\-mm4\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*synctest\s+results\s+on\s+xfs\/ext3$htree$\s+on\s+2\.6\.5\-rc3\-mm4\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. synctest results on xfs/ext3(htree) on 2.6.5-rc3-mm4 (score: 1): Author: Yusuf Goolamabbas <yusufg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 18:44:36 +0800; Here's result of running akpm's synctest available at http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/ext3-tools.tar.gz I tried to run synctest in a way which modelled Postfix's <http://www.postfix.o; /archives/xfs/2004-04/msg00028.html (8,157 bytes)
2. Re: synctest results on xfs/ext3(htree) on 2.6.5-rc3-mm4 (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 06:58:28 -0600; Did you use default mkfs parameters on xfs? Try upping the log size: mkfs -t xfs -f -l size=32768b ..... Also try mount -o logbufs=8 .... The multiple test dirs will make xfs spread out all over the; /archives/xfs/2004-04/msg00032.html (9,422 bytes)
3. Re: synctest results on xfs/ext3(htree) on 2.6.5-rc3-mm4 (score: 1): Author: Yusuf Goolamabbas <yusufg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 22:11:38 +0800; Big difference With your mkfs settings and mount options, the same synctest finishes in real 97.64 user 2.20 sys 30.19 That's close to a 10x difference from the original numbers Can't tell you about; /archives/xfs/2004-04/msg00033.html (8,515 bytes)
4. Re: synctest results on xfs/ext3(htree) on 2.6.5-rc3-mm4 (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 08:29:52 -0600; Thats somewhat of a relief, we should be able to get closer to ext3 than that, but at least it puts us in the same ballpark. That's OK, if our 2 week old lets me I might be able to try ext3 myself, j; /archives/xfs/2004-04/msg00034.html (9,133 bytes)
5. mode support for XFS (score: 1): Author: Yusuf Goolamabbas <yusufg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 18:44:36 +0800; Here's result of running akpm's synctest available at http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/ext3-tools.tar.gz I tried to run synctest in a way which modelled Postfix's <http://www.postfix.o; /archives/xfs/2004-04/msg00292.html (8,157 bytes)
6. raid5 - suggestions? (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 06:58:28 -0600; Did you use default mkfs parameters on xfs? Try upping the log size: mkfs -t xfs -f -l size=32768b ..... Also try mount -o logbufs=8 .... The multiple test dirs will make xfs spread out all over the; /archives/xfs/2004-04/msg00296.html (9,422 bytes)
7. ree) on 2.6.5-rc3-mm4 (score: 1): Author: Yusuf Goolamabbas <yusufg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 22:11:38 +0800; Big difference With your mkfs settings and mount options, the same synctest finishes in real 97.64 user 2.20 sys 30.19 That's close to a 10x difference from the original numbers Can't tell you about; /archives/xfs/2004-04/msg00297.html (8,515 bytes)
8. ree) on 2.6.5-rc3-mm4 (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 08:29:52 -0600; Thats somewhat of a relief, we should be able to get closer to ext3 than that, but at least it puts us in the same ballpark. That's OK, if our 2 week old lets me I might be able to try ext3 myself, j; /archives/xfs/2004-04/msg00298.html (9,133 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]