Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*unable\s+to\s+open\s+initial\s+console\s+\[devfs\?\]\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*unable\s+to\s+open\s+initial\s+console\s+\[devfs\?\]\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. unable to open initial console [devfs?] (score: 1): Author: xxx; Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 14:02:45 -0600; I used the 2.4.5/1.0.1 RPM to upgrade my Redhat system (built w/ XFS 1.0 CD). The kernel seems happy but upon booting reports "unable to open initial console". I've seen this before when messing with; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00913.html (8,055 bytes)
2. Re: unable to open initial console [devfs?] (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 15:29:08 -0500; I went through this pain already. What I ended up doing was booting from a rescue disk, removing the dev package and then installing it again. -- Nate Straz nstraz@xxxxxxx sgi, inc http://www.sgi.com; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00916.html (9,300 bytes)
3. Re: unable to open initial console [devfs?] (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 14:32:07 -0600; Without meaning to start a flame-war, this is just one more example of why letting other people make your decisions for you is not a good thing to do. RPM (and probably other package managers) go ag; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00918.html (8,746 bytes)
4. Re: unable to open initial console [devfs?] (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: 19 Jul 2001 15:36:06 -0500; The 1.0.1 kernel does not have devfs at all, so your standard on-disk /dev should be there waiting for you... So, I'm not sure why you're seeing this problem. /etc/rc.sysinit starts devfsd if it find; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00919.html (9,189 bytes)
5. Re: unable to open initial console [devfs?] (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 16:17:50 -0600; Well, messing with .devfsd and rc.sysinit has no effect on the kernel failure. I may have to do what Nathan did. Has anyone else seen this problem and found an easy fix for it? At 3:36 PM -0500 7/19/; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00923.html (10,288 bytes)
6. Re: unable to open initial console [devfs?] (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 08:25:01 +0200; from mobile.sauter-bc.com (unknown [10.1.6.21]) by basel1.sauter-bc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BEE657306; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 08:34:47 +0200 (CEST) Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx Organization: Sauter AG,; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00938.html (9,036 bytes)
7. unable to open initial console [devfs?] (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxx; Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 14:02:45 -0600; I used the 2.4.5/1.0.1 RPM to upgrade my Redhat system (built w/ XFS 1.0 CD). The kernel seems happy but upon booting reports "unable to open initial console". I've seen this before when messing with; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02204.html (8,055 bytes)
8. Re: unable to open initial console [devfs?] (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 15:29:08 -0500; I went through this pain already. What I ended up doing was booting from a rescue disk, removing the dev package and then installing it again. -- Nate Straz nstraz@xxxxxxx sgi, inc http://www.sgi.com; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02207.html (9,300 bytes)
9. Re: unable to open initial console [devfs?] (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 14:32:07 -0600; Without meaning to start a flame-war, this is just one more example of why letting other people make your decisions for you is not a good thing to do. RPM (and probably other package managers) go ag; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02209.html (8,746 bytes)
10. Re: unable to open initial console [devfs?] (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: 19 Jul 2001 15:36:06 -0500; The 1.0.1 kernel does not have devfs at all, so your standard on-disk /dev should be there waiting for you... So, I'm not sure why you're seeing this problem. /etc/rc.sysinit starts devfsd if it find; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02210.html (9,189 bytes)
11. Re: unable to open initial console [devfs?] (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 16:17:50 -0600; Well, messing with .devfsd and rc.sysinit has no effect on the kernel failure. I may have to do what Nathan did. Has anyone else seen this problem and found an easy fix for it? At 3:36 PM -0500 7/19/; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02214.html (10,288 bytes)
12. Re: unable to open initial console [devfs?] (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 08:25:01 +0200; from mobile.sauter-bc.com (unknown [10.1.6.21]) by basel1.sauter-bc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BEE657306; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 08:34:47 +0200 (CEST) Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx Organization: Sauter AG,; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02229.html (9,036 bytes)
13. unable to open initial console [devfs?] (score: 1): Author: Dean Brissinger <brissing@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 14:02:45 -0600; I used the 2.4.5/1.0.1 RPM to upgrade my Redhat system (built w/ XFS 1.0 CD). The kernel seems happy but upon booting reports "unable to open initial console". I've seen this before when messing with; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03495.html (8,395 bytes)
14. Re: unable to open initial console [devfs?] (score: 1): Author: Nathan Straz <nstraz@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 15:29:08 -0500; I went through this pain already. What I ended up doing was booting from a rescue disk, removing the dev package and then installing it again. -- Nate Straz nstraz@xxxxxxx sgi, inc http://www.sgi.com; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03498.html (9,657 bytes)
15. Re: unable to open initial console [devfs?] (score: 1): Author: "Steve Wolfe" <nw@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 14:32:07 -0600; Without meaning to start a flame-war, this is just one more example of why letting other people make your decisions for you is not a good thing to do. RPM (and probably other package managers) go ag; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03500.html (9,043 bytes)
16. Re: unable to open initial console [devfs?] (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: 19 Jul 2001 15:36:06 -0500; The 1.0.1 kernel does not have devfs at all, so your standard on-disk /dev should be there waiting for you... So, I'm not sure why you're seeing this problem. /etc/rc.sysinit starts devfsd if it find; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03501.html (9,531 bytes)
17. Re: unable to open initial console [devfs?] (score: 1): Author: Dean Brissinger <brissing@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 16:17:50 -0600; Well, messing with .devfsd and rc.sysinit has no effect on the kernel failure. I may have to do what Nathan did. Has anyone else seen this problem and found an easy fix for it? So, I'm not sure why y; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03505.html (10,564 bytes)
18. Re: unable to open initial console [devfs?] (score: 1): Author: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 08:25:01 +0200; from mobile.sauter-bc.com (unknown [10.1.6.21]) by basel1.sauter-bc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BEE657306; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 08:34:47 +0200 (CEST) Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx Organization: Sauter AG,; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03520.html (9,306 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]