Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*undelete\s+\-\s+xfsrecover\'ing\s+deleted\s+files\s+in\s+xfs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*undelete\s+\-\s+xfsrecover\'ing\s+deleted\s+files\s+in\s+xfs\s*$/: 36 ]

Total 36 documents matching your query.

1. Re: undelete - xfsrecover'ing deleted files in xfs (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 14:30:09 +0100; At 18:19 31-1-2002 -0800, Gabe E. Nydick wrote: Pay about 10K anywhere up, depending on the size of the drive to have it professionally done. Try using grep and dd. I have used that before to rescue; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00002.html (8,668 bytes)
2. Re: undelete - xfsrecover'ing deleted files in xfs (score: 1): Author: King Kac <kacperw@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 11:47:11 -0500; [insert amount of random swearwords] lost data then, eh? 10K is just a little bit above what I can spend, although I was aware of the option :-) Thanks for the help anyways. XFS reuses the freed bloc; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00007.html (9,388 bytes)
3. Re: undelete - xfsrecover'ing deleted files in xfs (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: 01 Feb 2002 11:10:00 -0600; Unfortunately there is no substitute for backups, because xfs uses complex on disk structures it is very difficult to get data back from a file once you remove it. Sure, if you did not allocate anyth; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00008.html (10,617 bytes)
4. Re: undelete - xfsrecover'ing deleted files in xfs (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 19:01:38 +0100; At 11:47 1-2-2002 -0500, King Kac wrote: [insert amount of random swearwords] lost data then, eh? 10K is just a little bit above what I can spend, although I was aware of the option :-) Thanks for th; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00010.html (9,561 bytes)
5. Re: undelete - xfsrecover'ing deleted files in xfs (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 19:33:34 +0100; If you have enough space left there is nothing that would force reuse of that same space directly afterwards. You could be lucky. When you can find the inode of the deleted file again and its extent; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00012.html (9,811 bytes)
6. Re: undelete - xfsrecover'ing deleted files in xfs (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: 01 Feb 2002 13:02:58 -0600; Unfortunately when we free an inode we also remove all the extents from it. So even if those extents used to be in the inode, they are not there now. The reason this happens is that deleting a file i; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00013.html (11,309 bytes)
7. Re: undelete - xfsrecover'ing deleted files in xfs (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 05:10:59 +0100; I see. The extents would be in a btree which would be likely rebalanced on the extent freeing and that would destroy them because they're inline in the btree. Is that correct? Thanks, -Andi; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00034.html (9,646 bytes)
8. Re: undelete - xfsrecover'ing deleted files in xfs (score: 1): Author: Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2002 13:51:21 -0600; Andi Kleen wrote: On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 01:02:58PM -0600, Steve Lord wrote: When you can find the inode of the deleted file again and its extent btrees are not destroyed it should be possible to re; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00050.html (11,254 bytes)
9. es? (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 14:30:09 +0100; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00576.html (8,668 bytes)
10. ion (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 11:47:11 -0500; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00581.html (9,388 bytes)
11. xfs (score: 1): Author: >; Date: 01 Feb 2002 11:10:00 -0600; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00582.html (10,617 bytes)
12. ing (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 19:01:38 +0100; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00584.html (9,561 bytes)
13. own (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 19:33:34 +0100; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00586.html (9,811 bytes)
14. xfs (score: 1): Author: >; Date: 01 Feb 2002 13:02:58 -0600; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00587.html (11,309 bytes)
15. ges (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 05:10:59 +0100; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00608.html (9,646 bytes)
16. ris (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2002 13:51:21 -0600; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00624.html (11,254 bytes)
17. [NEWS] Extended attributes interface changes (score: 1): Author: ie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 20:22:37 -0500; So I'm trying to recover some deleted files on my xfs-formatted hw raid array mounted on /home I read off of this newsgroup that xfsrestore was the tool to use. Here's what I'm trying to do: xfsdump; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00921.html (7,279 bytes)
18. ndelete - xfsrecover'ing deleted files in xfs (score: 1): Author: rw@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 19:24:59 -0600 (CST); Sorry, xfsrestore is only good if you've previously xfsdumped. If you deleted a file, the data may still be there on disk (as with any other filesystem) but there's no automated way to recover it. -E; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00922.html (8,115 bytes)
19. uring reboot (recovery) (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 21:03:25 -0500; That's what I was afraid of. What's the hard way of recovering it then? On 2002.01.31 20:24 Eric Sandeen wrote: Sorry, xfsrestore is only good if you've previously xfsdumped. If you deleted a file, t; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00925.html (8,677 bytes)
20. ndelete - xfsrecover'ing deleted files in xfs (score: 1): Author: rw@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 18:19:28 -0800; Pay about 10K anywhere up, depending on the size of the drive to have it professionally done.; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00926.html (8,739 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]