Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*why\s+is\s+log\s+version\=1\s+default\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*why\s+is\s+log\s+version\=1\s+default\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. why is log version=1 default? (score: 1): Author: Ed <spied@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 23:25:07 +0400; exist any reason do not use version=2 for log?; /archives/xfs/2005-06/msg00047.html (6,728 bytes)
2. Re: why is log version=1 default? (score: 1): Author: Tim Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 15:10:45 +1000; Hi Ed, I don't think so. The only problem would be if you wanted to mount the filesystem using a linux kernel predating around June 2002 and/or mounting on an IRIX kernel prior to 6.5.26. It would/sh; /archives/xfs/2005-06/msg00062.html (7,856 bytes)
3. Re: why is log version=1 default? (score: 1): Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 21:46:34 -0700; Does IRIX 6.5.26 support v2 directories anyway?; /archives/xfs/2005-06/msg00072.html (7,744 bytes)
4. Re: why is log version=1 default? (score: 1): Author: Tim Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 16:41:07 +1000; Hi Chris, I'm a bit confused by the question - are you confusing v2 directories with v2 logs perhaps? v2 directories went in around IRIX 6.5.5mf and became the default in 6.5.14mf. v2 logs went into; /archives/xfs/2005-06/msg00073.html (8,578 bytes)
5. why is log version=1 default? (score: 1): Author: Ed <spied@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 23:25:07 +0400; exist any reason do not use version=2 for log?; /archives/xfs/2005-06/msg00219.html (6,728 bytes)
6. Re: why is log version=1 default? (score: 1): Author: Tim Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 15:10:45 +1000; Hi Ed, I don't think so. The only problem would be if you wanted to mount the filesystem using a linux kernel predating around June 2002 and/or mounting on an IRIX kernel prior to 6.5.26. It would/sh; /archives/xfs/2005-06/msg00234.html (7,856 bytes)
7. Re: why is log version=1 default? (score: 1): Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 21:46:34 -0700; Does IRIX 6.5.26 support v2 directories anyway?; /archives/xfs/2005-06/msg00244.html (7,744 bytes)
8. Re: why is log version=1 default? (score: 1): Author: Tim Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 16:41:07 +1000; Hi Chris, I'm a bit confused by the question - are you confusing v2 directories with v2 logs perhaps? v2 directories went in around IRIX 6.5.5mf and became the default in 6.5.14mf. v2 logs went into; /archives/xfs/2005-06/msg00245.html (8,578 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]