- 1. xfs 14TB - check (score: 1)
- Author: tramper <michael.weingartner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 08:57:14 -0800 (PST)
- Hallo Forum, i formated a storage with 16 disks (Raid5 and sparedrive) with xfs. The volume is 14TB big. There where circuit Problems and we had several server shutdowns and Problems. Now I want to c
- /archives/xfs/2011-03/msg00022.html (6,817 bytes)
- 2. Re: xfs 14TB - check (score: 1)
- Author: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 19:11:25 +0100
- Le Wed, 2 Mar 2011 08:57:40 -0800 (PST) tramper <michael.weingartner@xxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait: You probably haven't got enough RAM. With an old version of xfs_progs, you need 6 to 8 GB of RAM to check
- /archives/xfs/2011-03/msg00025.html (7,498 bytes)
- 3. Re: xfs 14TB - check (score: 1)
- Author: pg_xf2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 18:17:25 +0000
- One of the many wonderful ideas that get published in this list! :-) You probably need a 64 bit systems with a lot more RAM: http://groups.google.com/group/comp.arch.storage/browse_thread/thread/f7b
- /archives/xfs/2011-03/msg00027.html (7,994 bytes)
- 4. Re: xfs 14TB - check (score: 1)
- Author: Zdenek Kaspar <zkaspar82@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 21:12:43 +0100
- Dne 2.3.2011 17:57, tramper napsal(a): Try big temporary swap for this purpose.. HTH, Z.
- /archives/xfs/2011-03/msg00028.html (8,932 bytes)
- 5. Re: xfs 14TB - check (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 17:13:05 +1100
- ^^^^^ There's your problem. Even if you put more in it, the 32-bit address space limit will be the limiting factor. You almost certainly need a 64-bit machine. Even with the latest xfs_repair, you ne
- /archives/xfs/2011-03/msg00036.html (8,285 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu