Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*xfs\s+bug\s+in\s+2\.6\.17\.9\?\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. xfs bug in 2.6.17.9? (score: 1)
Author: "Stian Jordet" <sjordet@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:45:27 +0200
I got this on my server today, while it was not doing anything in Aug 24 09:22:09 buick kernel: xfs_da_do_buf: bno 16777216 Aug 24 09:22:09 buick kernel: dir: inode 14715927 Aug 24 09:22:09 buick ker
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00175.html (10,963 bytes)

2. Re: xfs bug in 2.6.17.9? (score: 1)
Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:42:53 -0400 (EDT)
Aug 24 09:22:09 buick kernel: xfs_da_do_buf: bno 16777216 That is the bug from 2.6.17 -> 2.6.17.6. It was patched in 2.6.17.7, but I assume(?) if you never fixed your FS to begin with, you will still
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00177.html (11,808 bytes)

3. Re: xfs bug in 2.6.17.9? (score: 1)
Author: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:29:13 +0200
Am Donnerstag 24 August 2006 11:45 schrieb Stian Jordet: Hello Stian, It looks to me that the directory corruption bug in kernel 2.6.17 upto 2.6.17.6 hit you: Did you use a 2.6.17 kernel < 2.6.17.7 b
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00178.html (8,869 bytes)

4. Re: xfs bug in 2.6.17.9? (score: 1)
Author: Stian Jordet <liste@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 01:45:33 +0200
tor, 24,.08.2006 kl. 14.29 +0200, skrev Martin Steigerwald: Martin, thanks for your help. I did use both 2.6.17.1 and 2.6.17.3 before 2.6.17.9... So I guess (hope) that's the problem, and not my memo
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00182.html (9,489 bytes)

5. Re: xfs bug in 2.6.17.9? (score: 1)
Author: Stian Jordet <liste@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 01:47:43 +0200
tor, 24,.08.2006 kl. 09.42 -0400, skrev Justin Piszcz: As I just wrote to Martin, I did run a couple of those kernels. But even with updated xfsprogs I can't fix the errors... Is that "normal", or am
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00183.html (8,448 bytes)

6. Re: xfs bug in 2.6.17.9? (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:58:58 +1000
This is likely to be lost+found being recreated each time, its normal if you don't do something about the lost+found files - once those are renamed/removed, it should run cleanly. cheers. -- Nathan
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00184.html (9,211 bytes)

7. Re: xfs bug in 2.6.17.9? (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 22:08:38 -0700
More recent xfs_repair will deal better with it, I think it's in CVS now, I'm not entirely sure though. Search for the XFS faq, at the end there is a section on directory corruption and details on ho
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00187.html (8,559 bytes)

8. Re: xfs bug in 2.6.17.9? (score: 1)
Author: Stian Jordet <liste@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 08:15:38 +0200
fre, 25,.08.2006 kl. 11.58 +1000, skrev Nathan Scott: You seem to be right about that :) But when I wake up this morning, I had my logs full of this: 0x0: 24 73 74 61 74 73 20 3d 20 7b 0a 20 20 27 73
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00188.html (10,671 bytes)

9. Re: xfs bug in 2.6.17.9? (score: 1)
Author: Stian Jordet <liste@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 10:38:48 +0200
Stian Jordet wrote: fre, 25,.08.2006 kl. 11.58 +1000, skrev Nathan Scott: This is likely to be lost+found being recreated each time, its normal if you don't do something about the lost+found files -
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00193.html (11,048 bytes)

10. xfs bug in 2.6.17.9? (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:45:27 +0200
I got this on my server today, while it was not doing anything in Aug 24 09:22:09 buick kernel: xfs_da_do_buf: bno 16777216 Aug 24 09:22:09 buick kernel: dir: inode 14715927 Aug 24 09:22:09 buick ker
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00427.html (10,963 bytes)

11. Re: xfs bug in 2.6.17.9? (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:42:53 -0400 (EDT)
Aug 24 09:22:09 buick kernel: xfs_da_do_buf: bno 16777216 That is the bug from 2.6.17 -> 2.6.17.6. It was patched in 2.6.17.7, but I assume(?) if you never fixed your FS to begin with, you will still
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00429.html (11,808 bytes)

12. Re: xfs bug in 2.6.17.9? (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:29:13 +0200
Am Donnerstag 24 August 2006 11:45 schrieb Stian Jordet: Hello Stian, It looks to me that the directory corruption bug in kernel 2.6.17 upto 2.6.17.6 hit you: Did you use a 2.6.17 kernel < 2.6.17.7 b
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00430.html (8,869 bytes)

13. Re: xfs bug in 2.6.17.9? (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 01:45:33 +0200
tor, 24,.08.2006 kl. 14.29 +0200, skrev Martin Steigerwald: Martin, thanks for your help. I did use both 2.6.17.1 and 2.6.17.3 before 2.6.17.9... So I guess (hope) that's the problem, and not my memo
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00434.html (9,489 bytes)

14. Re: xfs bug in 2.6.17.9? (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 01:47:43 +0200
tor, 24,.08.2006 kl. 09.42 -0400, skrev Justin Piszcz: As I just wrote to Martin, I did run a couple of those kernels. But even with updated xfsprogs I can't fix the errors... Is that "normal", or am
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00435.html (8,448 bytes)

15. Re: xfs bug in 2.6.17.9? (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:58:58 +1000
This is likely to be lost+found being recreated each time, its normal if you don't do something about the lost+found files - once those are renamed/removed, it should run cleanly. cheers. -- Nathan
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00436.html (9,211 bytes)

16. Re: xfs bug in 2.6.17.9? (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 22:08:38 -0700
More recent xfs_repair will deal better with it, I think it's in CVS now, I'm not entirely sure though. Search for the XFS faq, at the end there is a section on directory corruption and details on ho
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00439.html (8,559 bytes)

17. Re: xfs bug in 2.6.17.9? (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 08:15:38 +0200
fre, 25,.08.2006 kl. 11.58 +1000, skrev Nathan Scott: You seem to be right about that :) But when I wake up this morning, I had my logs full of this: 0x0: 24 73 74 61 74 73 20 3d 20 7b 0a 20 20 27 73
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00440.html (10,671 bytes)

18. Re: xfs bug in 2.6.17.9? (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 10:38:48 +0200
Stian Jordet wrote: fre, 25,.08.2006 kl. 11.58 +1000, skrev Nathan Scott: This is likely to be lost+found being recreated each time, its normal if you don't do something about the lost+found files -
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00445.html (11,048 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu