Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*xfs\s+build\s+warning\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*xfs\s+build\s+warning\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. xfs build warning (score: 1): Author: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:48:02 -0700; on i386, when CONFIG_LBDAF is not enabled: fs/xfs/linux-2.6/./xfs_trace.h:1354: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 22 has type 'xfs_fsblock_t' -- ~Randy; /archives/xfs/2011-04/msg00193.html (6,490 bytes)
2. Re: xfs build warning (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 13:39:02 -0400; This should fix it: Index: linux-2.6/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_trace.h == -- linux-2.6.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_trace.h 2011-04-15 19:29:11.569340965 +0200 +++ linux-2.6/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_trace.h 2011; /archives/xfs/2011-04/msg00197.html (7,919 bytes)
3. Re: xfs build warning (score: 1): Author: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:47:47 -0700; Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks. -- ~Randy; /archives/xfs/2011-04/msg00198.html (8,582 bytes)
4. Re: xfs build warning (score: 1): Author: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 15:08:10 -0500; Looks good. Christoph, can I assume your signoff? I wonder whether we'll ever need to cast the other fields that are based on abstractions from __uint32_t (like xfs_agblock_t, xfs_extlen_t, ...). Rev; /archives/xfs/2011-04/msg00304.html (8,001 bytes)
5. Re: xfs build warning (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 00:14:30 -0400; I'll resend it with a proper changelog and signoff.; /archives/xfs/2011-04/msg00319.html (8,371 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]