Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*xfs\s+fails\s+to\s+recover\s+a\s+raid0\s+root\s+filesystem\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*xfs\s+fails\s+to\s+recover\s+a\s+raid0\s+root\s+filesystem\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. xfs fails to recover a raid0 root filesystem (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 10:20:10 +1000; Hi all, I've installed xfs on a netra (sparc) workstation. After a power failoure xfs just hangs trying to recover the root fs. The fs is actually sitting on the top of a raid0 configuration. I don't; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00288.html (8,665 bytes)
2. Re: xfs fails to recover a raid0 root filesystem (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 19:35:30 -0600; I just had this happen on a large-ish (150+Gb) array. Had nothing to do with RAID. You have to boot rescue disk and use xfs_repair. You may have to zero the logfile. Also note that if oyu're using qu; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00289.html (9,896 bytes)
3. Re: xfs fails to recover a raid0 root filesystem (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 03:18:03 +0200; Uhm, AFAIK there is now 'degradeted mode' with RAID-0. You lose one - you lose all! You probably want to run RAID-1 or -5 for redundancy. RAID-0 is just about speed and/or size. Cheers, Juri; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00290.html (8,548 bytes)
4. Re: xfs fails to recover a raid0 root filesystem (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 13:15:08 +1000; sorry... stupid me... I've raid1 (mirroring) not raid0. but still I don't know how to solve this problem... any advices ? tnx, p -- Civilization advances by extending the number of important operatio; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00291.html (8,375 bytes)
5. Re: xfs fails to recover a raid0 root filesystem (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 14:52:20 +1000; Hi all, This is already the second time it happens to me... :-(( Do you have any clue why this can happen ? Are you aware of any way of avoiding this problem or have an automatic recovery procedure ?; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00292.html (8,954 bytes)
6. Re: xfs fails to recover a raid0 root filesystem (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 11:46:03 +0200; Well, I don't know how many people out there use Linux on Sparc in real life. You could put the disks (or at least one) in an ia32 machine and boot with Knoppix and repair them there. Cheers, Juri; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00293.html (9,018 bytes)
7. Re: xfs fails to recover a raid0 root filesystem (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 07:59:28 -0700; You might want to try one of the Gentoo install disks. They have them available for multiple architectures, including Sparc. They're bootable, and even if they don't contain the necessary utilities,; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00294.html (9,740 bytes)
8. xfs fails to recover a raid0 root filesystem (score: 1): Author: kaos@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 10:20:10 +1000; Hi all, I've installed xfs on a netra (sparc) workstation. After a power failoure xfs just hangs trying to recover the root fs. The fs is actually sitting on the top of a raid0 configuration. I don't; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00595.html (8,665 bytes)
9. Re: xfs fails to recover a raid0 root filesystem (score: 1): Author: e@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 19:35:30 -0600; I just had this happen on a large-ish (150+Gb) array. Had nothing to do with RAID. You have to boot rescue disk and use xfs_repair. You may have to zero the logfile. Also note that if oyu're using qu; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00596.html (9,896 bytes)
10. Re: xfs fails to recover a raid0 root filesystem (score: 1): Author: is@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 03:18:03 +0200; Uhm, AFAIK there is now 'degradeted mode' with RAID-0. You lose one - you lose all! You probably want to run RAID-1 or -5 for redundancy. RAID-0 is just about speed and/or size. Cheers, Juri; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00597.html (8,548 bytes)
11. Re: xfs fails to recover a raid0 root filesystem (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 13:15:08 +1000; sorry... stupid me... I've raid1 (mirroring) not raid0. but still I don't know how to solve this problem... any advices ? tnx, p -- Civilization advances by extending the number of important operatio; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00598.html (8,375 bytes)
12. Re: xfs fails to recover a raid0 root filesystem (score: 1): Author: e@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 14:52:20 +1000; Hi all, This is already the second time it happens to me... :-(( Do you have any clue why this can happen ? Are you aware of any way of avoiding this problem or have an automatic recovery procedure ?; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00599.html (8,954 bytes)
13. Re: xfs fails to recover a raid0 root filesystem (score: 1): Author: e@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 11:46:03 +0200; Well, I don't know how many people out there use Linux on Sparc in real life. You could put the disks (or at least one) in an ia32 machine and boot with Knoppix and repair them there. Cheers, Juri; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00600.html (9,018 bytes)
14. Re: xfs fails to recover a raid0 root filesystem (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 07:59:28 -0700; You might want to try one of the Gentoo install disks. They have them available for multiple architectures, including Sparc. They're bootable, and even if they don't contain the necessary utilities,; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00601.html (9,740 bytes)
15. xfs fails to recover a raid0 root filesystem (score: 1): Author: Pietro Abate <Pietro.Abate@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 10:20:10 +1000; Hi all, I've installed xfs on a netra (sparc) workstation. After a power failoure xfs just hangs trying to recover the root fs. The fs is actually sitting on the top of a raid0 configuration. I don't; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00902.html (8,665 bytes)
16. Re: xfs fails to recover a raid0 root filesystem (score: 1): Author: Michael Loftis <mloftis@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 19:35:30 -0600; I just had this happen on a large-ish (150+Gb) array. Had nothing to do with RAID. You have to boot rescue disk and use xfs_repair. You may have to zero the logfile. Also note that if oyu're using qu; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00903.html (9,702 bytes)
17. Re: xfs fails to recover a raid0 root filesystem (score: 1): Author: Juri Haberland <juri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 03:18:03 +0200; Uhm, AFAIK there is now 'degradeted mode' with RAID-0. You lose one - you lose all! You probably want to run RAID-1 or -5 for redundancy. RAID-0 is just about speed and/or size. Cheers, Juri; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00904.html (8,606 bytes)
18. Re: xfs fails to recover a raid0 root filesystem (score: 1): Author: Pietro Abate <Pietro.Abate@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 13:15:08 +1000; sorry... stupid me... I've raid1 (mirroring) not raid0. but still I don't know how to solve this problem... any advices ? tnx, p -- Civilization advances by extending the number of important operatio; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00905.html (8,452 bytes)
19. Re: xfs fails to recover a raid0 root filesystem (score: 1): Author: Pietro Abate <Pietro.Abate@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 14:52:20 +1000; Hi all, This is already the second time it happens to me... :-(( Do you have any clue why this can happen ? Are you aware of any way of avoiding this problem or have an automatic recovery procedure ?; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00906.html (9,095 bytes)
20. Re: xfs fails to recover a raid0 root filesystem (score: 1): Author: Juri Haberland <juri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 11:46:03 +0200; Well, I don't know how many people out there use Linux on Sparc in real life. You could put the disks (or at least one) in an ia32 machine and boot with Knoppix and repair them there. Cheers, Juri; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00907.html (9,161 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]