Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*xfs\s+performance\s+tuning\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. xfs performance tuning (score: 1)
Author: "Wendy Cheng" <s_wendy_cheng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 18:15:11 -0400
We're trying out XFS using SPECsfs benchmark and could only get ~ half of the IOPS when compared with EXT2. It might not be a fair comparison since EXT2 is not a journaling file system but would love
/archives/xfs/2003-06/msg00014.html (8,171 bytes)

2. Re: xfs performance tuning (score: 1)
Author: "Wendy Cheng" <s_wendy_cheng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 21:29:56 -0400
Great thanks ! - but these are kind of obivous. Are there more ? :). Could I turn off / delay kupdated and assume that when incore log buffers are full, it would be automatically flushed into disk wi
/archives/xfs/2003-06/msg00015.html (9,508 bytes)

3. Re: xfs performance tuning (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 15:19:46 +1000
Why not post the XFS and ext2 numbers you are seeing currently with your current filesystem geometry (esp. xfs_info output), mount options, and kernel build options, and then any benchmark variations
/archives/xfs/2003-06/msg00016.html (10,817 bytes)

4. Re: xfs performance tuning (score: 1)
Author: Thomas Kirk <thomas@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 10:54:16 +0200
Does ACL decrase XFS performance considerable? -- Venlig hilsen/Kind regards Thomas Kirk ARKENA tlf/phone +4570233456 thomas(at)arkena(dot)com Http://www.arkena.com "It's not easy to juggle a pregna
/archives/xfs/2003-06/msg00017.html (9,357 bytes)

5. Re: xfs performance tuning (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 13:19:24 -0400
Thanks - will comply and send out the info. Also we just built a profiling kernel (thanks to SGI again for the kernprof tool). Need to run this first to see what's going on. Wendy -- -- Original Mes
/archives/xfs/2003-06/msg00022.html (11,076 bytes)

6. Re: xfs performance tuning (score: 1)
Author: hans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 08:15:33 +1000
Having ACLs enabled means slightly more work must be done, but not much. Having an ACL set on an inode means still more work must be done, including additional disk IO when the ACL is not being store
/archives/xfs/2003-06/msg00027.html (9,697 bytes)

7. xfs performance tuning (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 18:15:11 -0400
We're trying out XFS using SPECsfs benchmark and could only get ~ half of the IOPS when compared with EXT2. It might not be a fair comparison since EXT2 is not a journaling file system but would love
/archives/xfs/2003-06/msg00342.html (8,171 bytes)

8. Re: xfs performance tuning (score: 1)
Author: heng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 21:29:56 -0400
Great thanks ! - but these are kind of obivous. Are there more ? :). Could I turn off / delay kupdated and assume that when incore log buffers are full, it would be automatically flushed into disk wi
/archives/xfs/2003-06/msg00343.html (9,508 bytes)

9. Re: xfs performance tuning (score: 1)
Author: heng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 15:19:46 +1000
Why not post the XFS and ext2 numbers you are seeing currently with your current filesystem geometry (esp. xfs_info output), mount options, and kernel build options, and then any benchmark variations
/archives/xfs/2003-06/msg00344.html (10,817 bytes)

10. Re: xfs performance tuning (score: 1)
Author: <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 10:54:16 +0200
Does ACL decrase XFS performance considerable? -- Venlig hilsen/Kind regards Thomas Kirk ARKENA tlf/phone +4570233456 thomas(at)arkena(dot)com Http://www.arkena.com "It's not easy to juggle a pregna
/archives/xfs/2003-06/msg00345.html (9,357 bytes)

11. Re: xfs performance tuning (score: 1)
Author: Wourms <nwourms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 13:19:24 -0400
Thanks - will comply and send out the info. Also we just built a profiling kernel (thanks to SGI again for the kernprof tool). Need to run this first to see what's going on. Wendy -- -- Original Mes
/archives/xfs/2003-06/msg00350.html (11,076 bytes)

12. Re: xfs performance tuning (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 08:15:33 +1000
Having ACLs enabled means slightly more work must be done, but not much. Having an ACL set on an inode means still more work must be done, including additional disk IO when the ACL is not being store
/archives/xfs/2003-06/msg00355.html (9,697 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu