Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*xfs\s+removed\s+from\s+ftp\?\s*$/: 54 ]

Total 54 documents matching your query.

1. xfs removed from ftp? (score: 1)
Author: Jan Derfinak <ja@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 15:33:28 +0200 (CEST)
During last two weeks there was many problems with ftp access to xfs source code. There were notices about this problems in mailing list but I missed answers. Just now I tried ftp://oss.sgi.com but
/archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00087.html (9,000 bytes)

2. Re: xfs removed from ftp? (score: 1)
Author: Net Llama! <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 09:39:06 -0400 (EDT)
I get the bad feeling that we can thank SCO for this. I just wish that some kind of official statement would be made, even if its dripping in protective legalese. If I can't access any XFS code, its
/archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00088.html (11,074 bytes)

3. Re: xfs removed from ftp? (score: 1)
Author: Martin Spott <Martin.Spott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 11 Oct 2003 20:02:16 GMT
Even if you can't access it on the official site, there are still mirror servers that contain the recent releases, Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
/archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00092.html (8,877 bytes)

4. Re: xfs removed from ftp? (score: 1)
Author: Net Llama! <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 19:42:55 -0400 (EDT)
That's not true. I googled for the mirrors, and they're all either months out of date, or no longer host the XFS code at all. On the good news front, a person who wishes to remain anonymous told me t
/archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00093.html (9,556 bytes)

5. Re: xfs removed from ftp? (score: 1)
Author: Net Llama! <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 21:36:23 -0400 (EDT)
I can't answer that question, because i don't work for SGI. If i had to speculate, i'd say its primarily because SGI is alot smaller (and unfortunately, less stable) of a company than IBM. No argumen
/archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00094.html (9,954 bytes)

6. Re: xfs removed from ftp? (score: 1)
Author: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 18:40:34 -0800
well if the mirror is activly mirroring the main sgi site then the mirror will reflect the deletion of all the XFS files. hrm, well i certianly hope they don't decide to wait until SCO is told to FOA
/archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00095.html (10,573 bytes)

7. Re: xfs removed from ftp? (score: 1)
Author: Net Llama! <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 23:13:03 -0400 (EDT)
cvs should be working right now. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lonni J Friedman netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.co
/archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00096.html (9,563 bytes)

8. Re: xfs removed from ftp? (score: 1)
Author: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 13:42:20 +1000
For SGI's response, see http://oss.sgi.com/letter_100103.txt Paragraphs 4 and 5 answer this question. Not speaking for SGI, IANAL, etc.
/archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00097.html (8,969 bytes)

9. Re: xfs removed from ftp? (score: 1)
Author: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 20:04:17 -0800
also the xfs dir is available now, but no code is there yet. however there is a README explaining this: ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/README -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
/archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00098.html (10,406 bytes)

10. Re: xfs removed from ftp? (score: 1)
Author: Martin Spott <Martin.Spott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 12 Oct 2003 09:19:25 GMT
You don't believe me without a proof ? Please see: ftp://ftp.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/Mirrors/ Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! --
/archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00099.html (9,329 bytes)

11. Re: xfs removed from ftp? (score: 1)
Author: Zeitgeist <zeitgeist@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 21:03:26 -0500
Why is SGI bending their ass over for these losers? All the other companies just ignore them, like SGI should. We all know the company in question is avoiding actually going into the courtroom becaus
/archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00101.html (9,536 bytes)

12. Re: xfs removed from ftp? (score: 1)
Author: Martin Spott <Martin.Spott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 13 Oct 2003 14:50:12 GMT
Did you know the "Unix Administration Horror Story Summary" ? "More systems have been wiped out by admins than any hacker could do in a lifetime." This monday morning I've proven to be too stupid for
/archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00106.html (9,803 bytes)

13. Re: xfs removed from ftp? (score: 1)
Author: Max Clark <maxc-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 09:22:41 -0700
Can anyone point me to a working mirror with the Release 1.3.1? Thanks, Max -- Max Clark <maxc at beast.clarksys.com> <a href="http://www.clarksys.com">Max Clark</a>
/archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00108.html (9,482 bytes)

14. Re: xfs removed from ftp? (score: 1)
Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 11:44:48 -0500
http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download.html
/archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00109.html (9,812 bytes)

15. Re: xfs removed from ftp? (score: 1)
Author: Martin Spott <Martin.Spott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 14 Oct 2003 06:27:35 GMT
Would'nt it have been useful to put a patch for the current kernel into the updated Release - say for 2.4.22 ? Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! --
/archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00113.html (9,632 bytes)

16. Re: xfs removed from ftp? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 14 Oct 2003 05:14:14 -0500
Yes, but given the schedule we were on, there was no time. 2.4.22 changes the file system I/O path, we would have had to backport that to 1.3.1. The only way to get something with a reasonable guaran
/archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00114.html (9,951 bytes)

17. Re: xfs removed from ftp? (score: 1)
Author: lw <xfs@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 23:59:38 -0700
Russell Cattelan wrote: On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 11:22, Max Clark wrote: Can anyone point me to a working mirror with the Release 1.3.1 http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download.html Thanks, Max -- Max C
/archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00135.html (12,020 bytes)

18. Re: xfs removed from ftp? (score: 1)
Author: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 23:21:06 +1000
ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/ does not exist. Use ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/ for now. Could somebody on oss please put back the old name, including the download path?
/archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00137.html (8,720 bytes)

19. xfs removed from ftp? (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 15:33:28 +0200 (CEST)
During last two weeks there was many problems with ftp access to xfs source code. There were notices about this problems in mailing list but I missed answers. Just now I tried ftp://oss.sgi.com but
/archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00371.html (9,000 bytes)

20. Re: xfs removed from ftp? (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 09:39:06 -0400 (EDT)
I get the bad feeling that we can thank SCO for this. I just wish that some kind of official statement would be made, even if its dripping in protective legalese. If I can't access any XFS code, its
/archives/xfs/2003-10/msg00372.html (11,074 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu