Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*xfs_check\,\s+xfs_repair\s+should\s+added\s+to\s+the\s+xfs\s+install\s+iso\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*xfs_check\,\s+xfs_repair\s+should\s+added\s+to\s+the\s+xfs\s+install\s+iso\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. xfs_check, xfs_repair should added to the xfs install iso (score: 1): Author: utz lehmann <xfs@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 18:51:37 +0200; I just tested the rescue mode of the RH 7.1 xfs install iso. (I dont needed this time .-) I dont found xfs_check and xfs_repair binaries in rescue mode. I think they should added. fsck for ext2 and; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00496.html (7,460 bytes)
2. Re: xfs_check, xfs_repair should added to the xfs install iso (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 12:45:25 -0500; Hmmm, that was supposed to have happened, I discovered this problem a few weeks ago and I thought the change was made to get them out there. Russell, did this change go missing? Steve; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00497.html (8,249 bytes)
3. Re: xfs_check, xfs_repair should added to the xfs install iso (score: 1): Author: K Mitchell Russell <kmrussel@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 14:19:10 -0400 (EDT); Interestingly, I booted into linux rescue off the RH7.1 XFS 1.0 iso a couple days ago, and found xfs_check and xfs_repair to run fine. Are there two versions of the 1.0 iso released? Regards, Mitchel; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00499.html (8,463 bytes)
4. Re: xfs_check, xfs_repair should added to the xfs install iso (score: 1): Author: utz lehmann <xfs@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 19:44:25 +0200; opps. my fault. This was a test release. I should label my CDRs better. sorry. utz; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00500.html (8,835 bytes)
5. Re: xfs_check, xfs_repair should added to the xfs install iso (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 13:27:47 -0500; OK, this maybe the problem - Utz are you sure you are using the official 1.0 iso, or an older one. I do not think these commands would be there in any of the pre-release versions. Steve; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00501.html (9,072 bytes)
6. Re: xfs_check, xfs_repair should added to the xfs install iso (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 13:29:10 -0500; No, although there are several -testX releases. Utz, are you sure you have the REAL 1.0? TRANS.TBL in the root dir should be dated April 27. -Eric -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/pro; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00502.html (8,202 bytes)
7. xfs_check, xfs_repair should added to the xfs install iso (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 18:51:37 +0200; I just tested the rescue mode of the RH 7.1 xfs install iso. (I dont needed this time .-) I dont found xfs_check and xfs_repair binaries in rescue mode. I think they should added. fsck for ext2 and; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01860.html (7,460 bytes)
8. Re: xfs_check, xfs_repair should added to the xfs install iso (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 12:45:25 -0500; Hmmm, that was supposed to have happened, I discovered this problem a few weeks ago and I thought the change was made to get them out there. Russell, did this change go missing? Steve; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01861.html (8,249 bytes)
9. Re: xfs_check, xfs_repair should added to the xfs install iso (score: 1): Author: rmin Molina); Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 14:19:10 -0400 (EDT); Interestingly, I booted into linux rescue off the RH7.1 XFS 1.0 iso a couple days ago, and found xfs_check and xfs_repair to run fine. Are there two versions of the 1.0 iso released? Regards, Mitchel; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01863.html (8,463 bytes)
10. Re: xfs_check, xfs_repair should added to the xfs install iso (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 19:44:25 +0200; opps. my fault. This was a test release. I should label my CDRs better. sorry. utz; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01864.html (8,835 bytes)
11. Re: xfs_check, xfs_repair should added to the xfs install iso (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 13:27:47 -0500; OK, this maybe the problem - Utz are you sure you are using the official 1.0 iso, or an older one. I do not think these commands would be there in any of the pre-release versions. Steve; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01865.html (9,072 bytes)
12. Re: xfs_check, xfs_repair should added to the xfs install iso (score: 1): Author: ord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 13:29:10 -0500; No, although there are several -testX releases. Utz, are you sure you have the REAL 1.0? TRANS.TBL in the root dir should be dated April 27. -Eric -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/pro; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01866.html (8,202 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]