- 1. review: add a splice command to xfs_io (score: 1)
- Author: support@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 23:22:26 -0600
- es (2.6.22> or 2.6.23>). -- Thanks, Oliver
- /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg00341.html (7,434 bytes)
- 2. command to xfs_io (score: 1)
- Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 23:26:27 -0500
- t into making stack size a boot parameter
- /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg00342.html (7,927 bytes)
- 3. killer doesn't kill the right task.... (score: 1)
- Author: support@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:52:01 -0600
- e low-level name duplication code could be factored out a little more ala: /* * If a case-insensitive match, allocate a buffer and copy the actual * name into the buffer. Return it via args->
- /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg00385.html (8,124 bytes)
- 4. able? (score: 1)
- Author: support@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:56:11 -0600
- an external USB HDD, which I wanted to use as a temporary storage for my personal data while I clean up my local hdd. And while moving files from local hdd to external hdd, it stopped respond
- /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg00416.html (8,884 bytes)
- 5. ks default (score: 1)
- Author: support@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 23:22:26 -0600
- page of Ulybin Gennadiy added 2. Personal page of Demakov Yevgen
- /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg00937.html (7,434 bytes)
- 6. kstacks default (score: 1)
- Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 23:26:27 -0500
- We all know that there once were problems, but if there are any left they should be reported and fixed. cu Adrian --
- /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg00938.html (7,927 bytes)
- 7. sensitive match for dentry cache (score: 1)
- Author: support@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:52:01 -0600
- s quite clean, but there still is the fundamental issue of rejecting perfectly fine UNIX filenames in xfs_unicode_validate, as discussed in the last round a Unix filename is any valid N
- /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg00981.html (8,124 bytes)
- 8. hanges on UP. (score: 1)
- Author: support@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:56:11 -0600
- count reserved block changes on UP. On uniprocessor machines, the incore superblock is used for all in memory accounting of free blocks. in this situation, changes to the reserved block
- /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg01012.html (8,884 bytes)
- 9. xfs_repair -n report (score: 1)
- Author: support@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 23:22:26 -0600
- RAID 5 - 4 disks on 9550 AMCC production machine / backup disk failed also verified without error - rebuilt after abrupt power shut down cannot mount - inconsistencies indicated - could not dump fs H
- /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg01533.html (7,434 bytes)
- 10. Re: xfs_repair -n report (score: 1)
- Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 23:26:27 -0500
- The attachment appears to be 0 length. -Eric
- /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg01534.html (7,995 bytes)
- 11. Fwd: xfs_repair -n report (score: 1)
- Author: support@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:52:01 -0600
- Sorry, I truncated the original logfile of 128MB to a short version for review. Again, all comments welcome. Regards, Vincent -- Forwarded Message -- RAID 5 - 4 disks on 9550 AMCC production machine
- /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg01577.html (8,124 bytes)
- 12. Fwd: xfs_repair -n report (score: 1)
- Author: support@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:56:11 -0600
- Here is the log when xfs_repair -Lv I noticed on one thread that someone mentioned a patch that works on the error "Unexpected inode type 0160000 inode 1342181331" Anyone know where this patch is? Re
- /archives/xfs/2008-04/msg01608.html (8,884 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu