Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*xfsdump\s+looking\s+for\s+libhandle\.la\s+in\s+\/lib\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*xfsdump\s+looking\s+for\s+libhandle\.la\s+in\s+\/lib\s*$/: 36 ]

Total 36 documents matching your query.

1. xfsdump looking for libhandle.la in /lib (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 15:21:25 +0800 (PHT); Hi everyone, Just thought I'd let you know that in the current CVS xfsdump looks for libhandle.la in /lib, while xfslibs-dev puts it in /usr/lib. What has been the decision about where to really put; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01168.html (8,406 bytes)
2. Re: xfsdump looking for libhandle.la in /lib (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 15:25:22 +0800 (PHT); Grr, in /lib pointing to /usr/lib/libhandle.la I mean. Built the xfsprogs package successfully with this. BTW, what's the current status of xfs_fsr? I don't know how stable it is, and how it handles; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01169.html (9,157 bytes)
3. Re: xfsdump looking for libhandle.la in /lib (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 17:46:12 +1000; Current xfsdump/configure.in in cvs looks in /usr/lib/libhandle.la - but even if it doesn't find this, it will fall back to -lhandle, so I'm not sure what the problem is? (error message?) Perhaps yo; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01170.html (10,300 bytes)
4. Re: xfsdump looking for libhandle.la in /lib (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 16:55:38 +0800 (PHT); I'm building a Debian package so I run "debian/rules build". It failed saying it could not find /lib/libhandle.la. There was no residual state. I have a copy of the CVS tree that I update, and a copy; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01172.html (10,148 bytes)
5. Re: xfsdump looking for libhandle.la in /lib (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 19:12:15 +1000; Without the actual error message though, I can't tell if its failing in the "configure" stage or the "build" stage. If its in the "configure" stage, your xfsdump is out of date, if its the "build" s; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01173.html (9,784 bytes)
6. Re: xfsdump looking for libhandle.la in /lib (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 17:16:41 +0800 (PHT); How can the CVS copy be out of date? I just did a cvs update. :) I just built xfsprogs from the same CVS copy. How can THAT be out of date? I already do. :) --> Jijo -- Federico Sevilla III :: jijo@x; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01174.html (8,855 bytes)
7. Re: xfsdump looking for libhandle.la in /lib (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 19:42:11 +1000; Oh - I just tried it, & you're right [sheepish grin]. Something must have been changed underneath me ... I'll go have another look. Actually, I should probably go home now. ;) thanks. -- Nathan; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01176.html (9,120 bytes)
8. Re: xfsdump looking for libhandle.la in /lib (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 18:04:58 +0800 (PHT); Hehehe. Oops. You've been working too hard, I guess. Glad I was able to broadcast a heads up. :) Yes, you probably should. I remember running "rm -fR *" from / once when I was tired. I forgot I wasn'; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01178.html (8,935 bytes)
9. Re: xfsdump looking for libhandle.la in /lib (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 14:26:36 +0300; I mailed this list about a kernel panic caused by xfs_fsr, but after upgrading to version 1.1.0 this problem disapeared. The changelog for that version says "merge fsr bug fixes from IRIX" and I thin; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01181.html (9,293 bytes)
10. Re: xfsdump looking for libhandle.la in /lib (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 09:49:22 -0500; xfs_fsr currently appears to create filesystems which will not unmount correctly. There is a reference count leak in there. It is on the todo list, but right now Eric is out with a new baby, and I h; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01188.html (9,694 bytes)
11. Re: xfsdump looking for libhandle.la in /lib (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 14:03:32 -0400; I noticed last night that I had some problems with "can't find libhandle", etc., after updating my CVS tree; there were some directories missing that cvs didn't grab, for some reason. I had to pull d; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01198.html (9,555 bytes)
12. Re: xfsdump looking for libhandle.la in /lib (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 22:15:56 +0200 (CEST); update with the -d option to fetch new directories. Cheers Seth; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01204.html (9,491 bytes)
13. xfsdump looking for libhandle.la in /lib (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 15:21:25 +0800 (PHT); Hi everyone, Just thought I'd let you know that in the current CVS xfsdump looks for libhandle.la in /lib, while xfslibs-dev puts it in /usr/lib. What has been the decision about where to really put; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02459.html (8,406 bytes)
14. Re: xfsdump looking for libhandle.la in /lib (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 15:25:22 +0800 (PHT); Grr, in /lib pointing to /usr/lib/libhandle.la I mean. Built the xfsprogs package successfully with this. BTW, what's the current status of xfs_fsr? I don't know how stable it is, and how it handles; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02460.html (9,157 bytes)
15. Re: xfsdump looking for libhandle.la in /lib (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 17:46:12 +1000; Current xfsdump/configure.in in cvs looks in /usr/lib/libhandle.la - but even if it doesn't find this, it will fall back to -lhandle, so I'm not sure what the problem is? (error message?) Perhaps yo; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02461.html (10,300 bytes)
16. Re: xfsdump looking for libhandle.la in /lib (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 16:55:38 +0800 (PHT); I'm building a Debian package so I run "debian/rules build". It failed saying it could not find /lib/libhandle.la. There was no residual state. I have a copy of the CVS tree that I update, and a copy; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02463.html (10,148 bytes)
17. Re: xfsdump looking for libhandle.la in /lib (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 19:12:15 +1000; Without the actual error message though, I can't tell if its failing in the "configure" stage or the "build" stage. If its in the "configure" stage, your xfsdump is out of date, if its the "build" s; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02464.html (9,784 bytes)
18. Re: xfsdump looking for libhandle.la in /lib (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 17:16:41 +0800 (PHT); How can the CVS copy be out of date? I just did a cvs update. :) I just built xfsprogs from the same CVS copy. How can THAT be out of date? I already do. :) --> Jijo -- Federico Sevilla III :: jijo@x; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02465.html (8,855 bytes)
19. Re: xfsdump looking for libhandle.la in /lib (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 19:42:11 +1000; Oh - I just tried it, & you're right [sheepish grin]. Something must have been changed underneath me ... I'll go have another look. Actually, I should probably go home now. ;) thanks. -- Nathan; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02467.html (9,120 bytes)
20. Re: xfsdump looking for libhandle.la in /lib (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 18:04:58 +0800 (PHT); Hehehe. Oops. You've been working too hard, I guess. Glad I was able to broadcast a heads up. :) Yes, you probably should. I remember running "rm -fR *" from / once when I was tired. I forgot I wasn'; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02469.html (8,935 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]